I'm referring more to Obama's frequent memes and jokes either in videos, or at some conferences, specifically the Lion King fox news thing. Had Trump done shit like that, dorks like you would go nuts about it.
Except it's not about politics. It's just about a dumb guy doing dumb things while he has a lot of power. And of course, him leaving the Paris agreements won't have an effect on my future life?
That's correct, because the Paris agreements didn't even do anything. The media will tell you that, but in reality no one in the Paris agreements were really doing much of anything to help the environment to begin with. Your age is showing again.Except it's not about politics. It's just about a dumb guy doing dumb things while he has a lot of power. And of course, him leaving the Paris agreements won't have an effect on my future life?
If Trump was intelligent enough to sprinkle pop culture references and memes in, that would benefit him in a lot of other areas as well. I would not be mad. In reality, however, Trump doesn't even know how to use the internet, Twitter is the only app on his phone.
Ajit Pai has a very punchable face, but that's regardless of anything he says or does.
Most of the US is still on track to meet the Paris agreement standards state-by-state, so I guess we'll find out if it makes any difference in the long run.
I know that, but him saying "Sorry, Climate change is bullshit and we are not going to help" isn't exactly going to lead to further actions. I know the 2015 agreements are just talk, but that talk was kinda needed if we wanna go anywhere with that. Also, what's that obsession with my age?
Also sources for this before you go off on some nonsense the media told you
He thinks insulting your age will somehow improve his own arguments, which of course it doesn't. I'm 31, probably older than Maverick.
Also, you evidently don't understand the US political climate (or really anything about politics at all) if the president says something and backs out of it and that makes you think every company in the US and every movement for climate change is going to magically stop or be prevented from existing.
I'm sorry, but I've got more examples. At least Hitler cared about the German people, where Trump let over a thousand American citizens die from a nearly non-existent relief effort in Puerto Rico. The Trump administration continues to claim the number of deaths is closer to twenty. Not only is Trump responsible for every one of those deaths, the lie about the actual number of casualties should be enough to impeach on its own. Well, if Republicans had any integrity or conscience left it would be enough.
Hey what's your stance on Obama's drone strikes just curious
He reeeeaaally cared about those Jewish citizens of Germany....
This is a complicated subject. Given the option between potentially losing American lives on the ground vs using drones, I pick drones. Unfortunately the technology isn't as accurate as it should be yet, and the potential for collateral damage is there in every operation, so unintended casualties will happen. Obama will continue to take a lot of heat for the drone program, but every president will be using it from here on out anyway.
Again we were discussing Hitler's actions prior to the war, and the only reason people keep bringing up the Holocaust is because it's the only point on which Hitler is obviously much worse than Trump. Comparing them on a personal level you get much different results.
Right, but Trump is to blame for the inevitable -- people dying in relief efforts.
These are two completely different scenarios you're trying to equate. Puerto Rico wasn't a theater of war. The Trump administration was simply too disorganized and the relief effort came too late. If they were willing to own up to their mistakes and publish the real number of casualties, things would be different. Obviously that's not this administration's SOP, though, when they're caught in a lie they just make up a new lie or double down.
How about quoting the rest of what I said there and forming a decent argument against it, then? Shouldn't be too hard. Just remember: your political opinion only matters to the extent of the number in your bank account.
Man I can't possibly imagine why a country that's at least a trillion of dollars in debt would possibly be disorganized, especially not in the same time frame as Harvey, Irma, Jose, Maria. Now that's silly. The fact you're implying it's somehow not inevitable (or even preventable) that someone will die after natural disasters is really just sad.
I see what you’re saying, and admittedly it’s mostly correct imo. But, I believe around the 60’s and 70’s the population began embracing a more liberal mindset. I believe it stuck around and that’s a talking point in how President Obama was elected. But progress is typically like this. 5 steps forward, 3 steps back. Rinse and repeat.
The number of casualties would've been half, if not less, with an appropriate relief effort. Here we go again with you getting real defensive over the worst actions someone else has taken. You don't have to worry, I'm not going to blame you for Trump's failures. Again, possibly the bigger issue is that the administration is lying about the total casualties.
The Real Jdbye
fluff663
@
K3Nv2:
@
RedColoredStars:
@
RedColoredStars:
@
RedColoredStars:
@
Black_Manta_8bit:
