Hacking Puyo Puyo Tetris, Cubic Ninja for the Switch

snoofly

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
1,012
Trophies
0
Age
54
XP
2,133
Country
United Kingdom
Because the trustzone code exec got fixed on 2.0.0 thats why
indeed
there seems to be a common misconception that sm:hax (3.0.0) == kernel hax (only 1.0.0 at present)
sm:hax offers retroarch etc and hbl, but for potential cfw/emunand, you’ll need kernel exploit
2.0.0 fixed a lot of the kernel vulnerabilities
of course there is potential for ninty to screw up again like they did for 3.0.0
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nezztor

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
indeed
there seems to be a common misconception that sm:hax (3.0.0) == kernel hax (only 1.0.0 at present)
sm:hax offers retroarch etc and hbl, but for potential cfw/emunand, you’ll need kernel exploit
2.0.0 fixed a lot of the kernel vulnerabilities
of course there is potential for ninty to screw up again like they did for 3.0.0
I thought "sm:hax" allowed for kernel on 3.0.0.
 

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
If not I'm fairly certain plutoo got kernel in 3.0.0, which is private and used with nxdbg
Kernel is private, yes, but they posted enough information during the conference intentionally for someone else to figure it out.

Edit: See 00:47:00 of the conference video.
 
Last edited by Lacius,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: @AncientBoi, My friend passed away 3 days ago. :(