Does the phrase "libtards" fit into your "civil argument"? Water is wet, the sky is blue, and the drumpf is a career criminal in Putin's control. There is nothing to "prove wrong". You appear to have been Fox-pilled; just remember it's never too late to evolve, change for the better, and open your eyes to reality!
Side note/curious: I wonder how many actual Russiabots operate on this forum? Based on post histories, threads being posted in, etc., one has to wonder....
Rofl, these are statements made in a public setting in front of other world leaders. Just because you want to ignore them doesn't mean they don't exist. I provided two sources for what I was claiming in the OP, and I can provide a third for the tariffs if you really need it. Keep those blinders on, pal.
The Mueller investigation has over 20 indictments already. The vast majority of the people indicted have direct ties to the Trump campaign. Again it's clear you're operating with blinders on because the facts are inconvenient.
i dont hate hillary, i just don't like the fact that she claims shes a "feminist", when you should've heard the way she spoke about the women bill raped, you wouldn't think the same about her. Also, she's a socialist, and that never works. I don't like her policies at all.
I don't understand what the deal here is. What will you say when mueller comes out with nothing? that his whole investigation was a huge waste of time and money? Or that trump and putin silenced him. There comes a point when you've taken things too far. There has been no evidence at all, that anyone in the trump campaign colluded with russia. There is evidence, however, that the Obama administration placed a spy in the trump campaign. How is that legal at all? the whole system is fucked up, and no matter WHAT person is in power, they can't actually fix the corruption behind it.Does the phrase "libtards" fit into your "civil argument"? Water is wet, the sky is blue, and the drumpf is a career criminal in Putin's control. There is nothing to "prove wrong". You appear to have been Fox-pilled; just remember it's never too late to evolve, change for the better, and open your eyes to reality!
Side note/curious: I wonder how many actual Russiabots operate on this forum? Based on post histories, threads being posted in, etc., one has to wonder....
Lol, that's definitely not Hillary. She's a corporate centrist bureaucrat. Would've just been the boring status quo for four years under Hillary, which now seems like a dreamscape compared to what we've actually had to deal with. Bernie was the Socialist, and he would've been my first pick for president. The income gap in America is ridiculous and growing larger every day.
Here's the full list of 23 indictments in the Russia investigation thus far, not that I expect anyone to stop parroting this lie about "no evidence."
you're right, i mixed the two of them up. Sorry about that. Why would you want a socialist in power though? Because what socialism does(as proven by history, Venezuela, and many other countries), is simply SAY they're helping the little guy out by making the rich people pay more in taxes. Then what happens, is the doctors and other factory leaders say "Why the fuck should I work all day, to support losers at home, when I could sit at home, for even more money!" Thats when the whole thing falls apart, because no one works anymore, no one provides food, no one performs surgeries. And then the people who imposed socialism in the first place walk out scot free, 100x richer than they were before. This is how it has played out in every country that imposed socialism. But MAYBE, just MAYBE, it could work for around 40-50 years, in a country that was already wealthy. What the problem is in america, is we AREN'T wealthy. The dollar's value falls every day. We are trillions in debt. Socialism would never work here, at least not anymore.
America has implemented a number of Socialist policies over the years, we've never stuck to one particular economic/social system. Nor was Bernie suggesting we transition to an entirely Socialist system, only that there are common sense solutions to ease the financial burden on the lower classes. Trump has ended up spending that money anyway, but in the form of massive tax cuts for corporations and the ultra-wealthy who didn't need them.
Not sure where you're getting that number. I get roughly an extra 20 cents per check. He didn't slash the personal tax rate near as much as he did the corporate tax rate.
Oh, well there are a lot of factors involved in that. Probably a very small portion is actually due to the tax cut. Over a trillion dollars has been added to the US debt since Trump took office, all money that could've gone to crumbling infrastructure, or education/tuition costs, or water purity in the US, but not a cent did.
Uhmm, nothing? Screeching about Hillary's e-mails again is just about the most impotent thing Republicans could be doing right now. It's obvious they don't really care too, otherwise there'd be an investigation into the Trump white house doxxing American citizens critical of them via e-mail. That was almost a year ago now.
@
BigOnYa:
@
BigOnYa:
