Members who reacted to message #141
All (2)
Like (2)
-
-
cainan__c
Well-Known Member From London , UK- Messages
- 263
- Blog entry comments
- 2
- Reaction score
- 117
- Trophies
- 0
-
GarnetSunset
Well-Known Member 34- Messages
- 213
- Blogs
- 1
- Blog entry comments
- 12
- Downloads
- 1
- Reaction score
- 248
- Trophies
- 0
-
-
Loading…
-
Xdqwerty
what are you looking at? -
realtimesave
-
Psionic Roshambo
-
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@SylverReZ, in my experience, I wouldn't say I am an audiophile because to me MP3s seem fine, frequency cut off but good enough lol although in my laundry list of freak gifts... Is the ability to hear frequencies beyond what anyone else I have ever met... I max out hearing tests with shocked looks from the Drs, sad part is I can hear frequencies much higher.+1
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I am thankful florescent lights are mostly LED now... And TVs are far less annoying lol
-
-
-
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, As somebody who has listened to music over everything, I prefer some good quality headphones that can output the sharpest audio. I listen to my music mostly with WAVE or FLAC files, with MP3s I can tell the difference straight away by the compression artifacts.+1 -
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I mean I can tell the difference even with a high bitrate MP3 but I guess "it sounds good enough"
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
Plus studio quality MP3's do exist, they are just like 512Kbps and are huge ass files lol
-
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, MP3s were designed to be as small as possible, so that they can be shared on the internet. WAVE files were more bigger in size and would take hours to upload back in the day.
-
-
-
-
-
-
