Reply to thread
GBAtemp.net - The Independent Video Game Community
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
GBAtemp.net - The Independent Video Game Community
Home
Log in
Terms & Rules
Donate
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Groups
Public Events
New
New posts
New resources
New blog entries
New profile posts
New blog entry comments
New threadmarks
Latest activity
Cheats
Cheat Codes Add and Request group
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom cheat codes
Pokémon Legends: Arceus cheat codes
Xenoblade Chronicles 3 cheat codes
Fire Emblem Engage cheat codes
Request a cheat...
Tutorials
Nintendo Switch tutorials
Nintendo 3DS tutorials
Nintendo Wii U tutorials
Reviews
Overview
Official reviews
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Chat
Top chatters
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
New posts
Search forums
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
GBAtemp News & Featured Content
GBAtemp & Scene News
Windows 11 will be a free upgrade for Windows 10 users and will feature new gaming enhancements
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smf" data-source="post: 9510368" data-attributes="member: 159384"><p>A combination of corporate clients who are cautious about any kind of change that will require retraining/compatibility for line of business apps (but still want to receive security updates) & also a chance to cut off some older machines to save themselves some money in terms of development and testing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Frankly if you can't follow instructions on how to enable it, then you shouldn't be attempting to install an operating system upgrade in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Expect to see a lot of articles on how to enable or fit a TPM (and TPM availability, taking into account the silicon shortage) now that they've announced</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It reduces the amount of meeting, development and testing they have by 3/4. How many people move it? And is there any good reason for them to move it? "I like it when it annoys people who try to use my computer" is not something I think Microsoft should be paying for.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Windows 10X was based on Windows Core, as is Windows 10.</p><p></p><p>Windows 11 has the UI from Windows 10X but it's not Windows 10X.</p><p></p><p>The distinction between Windows 10 and Windows 11 is mostly marketing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Windows 10 has been great for me, much better than Windows 7. But then I find Linux a train wreck that only survived due to hatred of Microsoft and I stopped hating them 20 years ago when I gave up using my Amiga as my main machine at home.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Supposedly nobody will be forced to update to Windows 11. You've got 4 years of updates and then it will be up to you, either you carry on without updates and risk being hacked or you figure a way to meet the requirements.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's going to be interesting on how that pans out, it doesn't seem to work like bluestacks etc as I think they said apps would need to opt in.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know what it's like on Windows 10 Home, but Windows 10 Pro is pretty good with updates. At least now they fixed it so you could throttle the update download. In the beginning, when I only had 2mb/s, I'd be streaming something on TV and it would stop & I'd have to suspend my laptop.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Although the leak is an older build, that is basically what Windows 11 is.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When Windows 10 launched (six years ago) they planned on feature updates every 6 months rather than repeating the same mistake they had made previously where they would disappear and come back 5 years later with a new version of Windows.</p><p></p><p>They've slightly changed their mind as they had the work from Windows 10X that would otherwise be wasted as the hardware it was for is no longer coming. I don't think you can blame them for this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TPM isn't a requirement for bitlocker, the default security level cannot be used without a TPM but you can lower it.</p><p></p><p>I don't doubt that a lot of people will be looking for ways to install Windows 11 without a TPM & they may well find one. I suspect more people will just get a TPM.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Dell etc pay per copy of Windows 10, they'll pay the same per copy of Windows 11.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would expect a lot of "can you help me upgrade my computer to windows 11 calls".</p><p>There will probably be a TPM shortage too</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The leaked build is not a good indication of what they will accept in terms of hardware and licensing as they can make that decision right at the last minutes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually it seems to be the other way round, the insider builds will not enforce the minimum requirements. At general availability you'll be forced to re-install windows 10 if your machine doesn't meet the minimum requirements. You can't even stay on windows 11 insider builds.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That doesn't surprise me, but don't expect that to work forever. If they are serious about enforcing TPM then they are perfectly capable of doing so. As they are also enforcing Secure Boot then patching out the check will be impossible, you'd have to break Secure Boot...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As the minimum system requirements aren't going to be enforced until general availability (maybe November this year???) then it would be premature to say that you can work round them as you don't have that version. But then it helps to check things out before posting.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you have a desktop then adding a TPM might be easy (and pretty cheap), laptops without TPM or a new enough chipset to support firmware TPM might be out of luck. I do wonder if a USB/PCIE TPM is possible.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It proves that they don't enforce the announced general availability minimum system requirements, like they say don't.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2021/06/24/preparing-for-insider-preview-builds-of-windows-11/" target="_blank">https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2021/06/24/preparing-for-insider-preview-builds-of-windows-11/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you have a desktop with a TPM it's probably removable & you can fit a 2.0 module.</p><p></p><p>How old is your computer? UEFI came out in 2006. Secure Boot was added in UEFI 2.3.1, which was around 2012.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You buy it once and get free upgrades, what is the problem with that?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's probably got what is referred to as a firmware TPM.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.onlogic.com/company/io-hub/intel-platform-trust-technology-ptt-tpm-for-the-masses/" target="_blank">https://www.onlogic.com/company/io-hub/intel-platform-trust-technology-ptt-tpm-for-the-masses/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not sure why you wouldn't want to use bitlocker, but you should be able to get a TPM for the Desktop.</p><p>Laptops are harder, even if there is a TPM header then dismantling it could be a PITA. I've</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Have you enabled secure boot? I suspect that will be a bit of a sticking point for people who dual boot, you can do it but a lot of people seem to rage at secure boot and instantly turn it off.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>11 looks great, it basically is windows 10.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's actually people not liking change.</p><p></p><p>I remember a huge backlash against Microsoft for adding the Start Menu to Windows 95, because they liked Program Manager in Windows 3.1.</p><p></p><p>Then when they removed it from Windows 7 there was a huge backlash.</p><p></p><p>I have run WIndows 95/98/NT4/2k/XP/Vista/7/8.1/10 and once I'd spent a week with each then I wouldn't go back.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd expect that to change now that there is a compelling reason to have one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Or maybe that link is giving incorrect information.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11" target="_blank">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11</a></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>Minimum system requirements</strong></span></p><p>TPM <a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/information-protection/tpm/trusted-platform-module-overview" target="_blank">Trusted Platform Module (TPM)</a> version 2.0</p><p></p><p>It's not being enforced in any of the beta builds yet, so we can't tell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Does it show up in device manager? It might need a driver.</p><p>Did you enable secure boot?</p><p>Do you meet all the other requirements?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There was never a promise to break.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A: & B: aren't floppy disk drives, I could set my 2nd hard drive to be A: or B: if I wanted. Drive letters aren't going away.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>CON is part of Windows and even if they did drop 32 bit app support, then CON it would remain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smf, post: 9510368, member: 159384"] A combination of corporate clients who are cautious about any kind of change that will require retraining/compatibility for line of business apps (but still want to receive security updates) & also a chance to cut off some older machines to save themselves some money in terms of development and testing. Frankly if you can't follow instructions on how to enable it, then you shouldn't be attempting to install an operating system upgrade in the first place. Expect to see a lot of articles on how to enable or fit a TPM (and TPM availability, taking into account the silicon shortage) now that they've announced It reduces the amount of meeting, development and testing they have by 3/4. How many people move it? And is there any good reason for them to move it? "I like it when it annoys people who try to use my computer" is not something I think Microsoft should be paying for. Windows 10X was based on Windows Core, as is Windows 10. Windows 11 has the UI from Windows 10X but it's not Windows 10X. The distinction between Windows 10 and Windows 11 is mostly marketing. Windows 10 has been great for me, much better than Windows 7. But then I find Linux a train wreck that only survived due to hatred of Microsoft and I stopped hating them 20 years ago when I gave up using my Amiga as my main machine at home. Supposedly nobody will be forced to update to Windows 11. You've got 4 years of updates and then it will be up to you, either you carry on without updates and risk being hacked or you figure a way to meet the requirements. It's going to be interesting on how that pans out, it doesn't seem to work like bluestacks etc as I think they said apps would need to opt in. I don't know what it's like on Windows 10 Home, but Windows 10 Pro is pretty good with updates. At least now they fixed it so you could throttle the update download. In the beginning, when I only had 2mb/s, I'd be streaming something on TV and it would stop & I'd have to suspend my laptop. Although the leak is an older build, that is basically what Windows 11 is. When Windows 10 launched (six years ago) they planned on feature updates every 6 months rather than repeating the same mistake they had made previously where they would disappear and come back 5 years later with a new version of Windows. They've slightly changed their mind as they had the work from Windows 10X that would otherwise be wasted as the hardware it was for is no longer coming. I don't think you can blame them for this. TPM isn't a requirement for bitlocker, the default security level cannot be used without a TPM but you can lower it. I don't doubt that a lot of people will be looking for ways to install Windows 11 without a TPM & they may well find one. I suspect more people will just get a TPM. Dell etc pay per copy of Windows 10, they'll pay the same per copy of Windows 11. I would expect a lot of "can you help me upgrade my computer to windows 11 calls". There will probably be a TPM shortage too The leaked build is not a good indication of what they will accept in terms of hardware and licensing as they can make that decision right at the last minutes. Actually it seems to be the other way round, the insider builds will not enforce the minimum requirements. At general availability you'll be forced to re-install windows 10 if your machine doesn't meet the minimum requirements. You can't even stay on windows 11 insider builds. How? That doesn't surprise me, but don't expect that to work forever. If they are serious about enforcing TPM then they are perfectly capable of doing so. As they are also enforcing Secure Boot then patching out the check will be impossible, you'd have to break Secure Boot... As the minimum system requirements aren't going to be enforced until general availability (maybe November this year???) then it would be premature to say that you can work round them as you don't have that version. But then it helps to check things out before posting. If you have a desktop then adding a TPM might be easy (and pretty cheap), laptops without TPM or a new enough chipset to support firmware TPM might be out of luck. I do wonder if a USB/PCIE TPM is possible. It proves that they don't enforce the announced general availability minimum system requirements, like they say don't. [URL]https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2021/06/24/preparing-for-insider-preview-builds-of-windows-11/[/URL] If you have a desktop with a TPM it's probably removable & you can fit a 2.0 module. How old is your computer? UEFI came out in 2006. Secure Boot was added in UEFI 2.3.1, which was around 2012. You buy it once and get free upgrades, what is the problem with that? It's probably got what is referred to as a firmware TPM. [URL]https://www.onlogic.com/company/io-hub/intel-platform-trust-technology-ptt-tpm-for-the-masses/[/URL] I'm not sure why you wouldn't want to use bitlocker, but you should be able to get a TPM for the Desktop. Laptops are harder, even if there is a TPM header then dismantling it could be a PITA. I've Have you enabled secure boot? I suspect that will be a bit of a sticking point for people who dual boot, you can do it but a lot of people seem to rage at secure boot and instantly turn it off. 11 looks great, it basically is windows 10. It's actually people not liking change. I remember a huge backlash against Microsoft for adding the Start Menu to Windows 95, because they liked Program Manager in Windows 3.1. Then when they removed it from Windows 7 there was a huge backlash. I have run WIndows 95/98/NT4/2k/XP/Vista/7/8.1/10 and once I'd spent a week with each then I wouldn't go back. I'd expect that to change now that there is a compelling reason to have one. Or maybe that link is giving incorrect information. [URL]https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11[/URL] [SIZE=5][B]Minimum system requirements[/B][/SIZE] TPM [URL='https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/information-protection/tpm/trusted-platform-module-overview']Trusted Platform Module (TPM)[/URL] version 2.0 It's not being enforced in any of the beta builds yet, so we can't tell. Does it show up in device manager? It might need a driver. Did you enable secure boot? Do you meet all the other requirements? There was never a promise to break. A: & B: aren't floppy disk drives, I could set my 2nd hard drive to be A: or B: if I wanted. Drive letters aren't going away. CON is part of Windows and even if they did drop 32 bit app support, then CON it would remain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
GBAtemp News & Featured Content
GBAtemp & Scene News
Windows 11 will be a free upgrade for Windows 10 users and will feature new gaming enhancements
General chit-chat
Help
Users
Settings
Notifications
Miscellaneous
Inverse message direction
Display editor on top
Enable maximized mode
Display images as links
Hide bot messages
Hide statuses
Hide chatter list
Show messages from ignored users
Temporarily disable chat
Receive mention alerts
Sound notifications
Normal messages
Private messages
Whisper messages
Mention messages
Bot messages
Desktop notifications
Normal messages
Private messages
Whisper messages
Mention messages
Bot messages
Options
Options
View top chatters
K3Nv2
Loading…
BakerMan
Loading…
I rather enjoy a life of taking it easy. I haven't reached that life yet though.
@
Xdqwerty
:
Im bored recommend me some good browser games
Yesterday at 9:56 PM
@
Xdqwerty
:
speaking of games
Yesterday at 9:56 PM
@
Xdqwerty
:
gonna look if i still have that sd card adapter
Yesterday at 9:57 PM
@
Xdqwerty
:
if i have time for that
Yesterday at 10:21 PM
@
Psionic Roshambo
:
https://www.tomshardware.com/video-...roper-ray-tracing-ultrawide-high-fps-and-more
Yesterday at 10:36 PM
@
Xdqwerty
:
Ok so i do still have the adapter
Yesterday at 10:40 PM
@
K3Nv2
:
Sweet 4k triangles
+1
Yesterday at 10:42 PM
@
Psionic Roshambo
:
Lol
Yesterday at 10:54 PM
S
@
StealthD0g99
:
yo
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
@
Xdqwerty
:
@StealthD0g99
, welcome
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
@
Psionic Roshambo
:
Did they make a tomb raider for N64?
Yesterday at 10:56 PM
S
@
StealthD0g99
:
I am trying to hack Fire Emblem Warriors on my 2DS XL, I have been trying to get it to work, but I need some extra help figuring it out. I have HEX codes, and a possibly outdated plugin, but I dont know how to implement them
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
@
Psionic Roshambo
:
Can you just edit the save file on a PC?
Yesterday at 10:59 PM
S
@
StealthD0g99
:
how
Yesterday at 11:00 PM
S
@
StealthD0g99
:
Ive never done that before
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
@
Psionic Roshambo
:
https://gbatemp.net/download/fire-emblem-warriors-save-editor.34296/
Yesterday at 11:05 PM
@
Psionic Roshambo
:
Might work might not I don't know
Yesterday at 11:05 PM
@
K3Nv2
:
Werid went to put my ps5 ssd into my pcs m.2 bay and no detection
Yesterday at 11:18 PM
@
K3Nv2
:
Now its being detected as 2mb lol
Yesterday at 11:38 PM
@
Sicklyboy
:
That sounds bad
57 minutes ago
@
K3Nv2
:
Hopefully nothing shorted
57 minutes ago
@
K3Nv2
:
Could just be Sony bs locking partitions and all like lol shouldn't of removed it
54 minutes ago
@
Psionic Roshambo
:
2MBs is all you need it's fine lol
32 minutes ago
@
BakerMan
:
@Xdqwerty
i'm late, but pokerogue
11 minutes ago
@
K3Nv2
:
https://gbatemp.net/threads/ps5-m2sdd-quit-working-in-ps5.622567/page-2
guess I'm not the only one with issues
7 minutes ago
Submit
@
K3Nv2
:
https://gbatemp.net/threads/ps5-m2sdd-quit-working-in-ps5.622567/page-2 guess I'm not the only...
7 minutes ago
Chat
2