Privacy in the Modern Internet

Privacy is a hard thing to come by these days. It seems like just about every friendly neighborhood social media site wants to know where you are at ever waking moment. How do we solve this? Well, that's a hard question. With the rise of tracking technology that does things such as fingerprint your browser
(https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/ for more information.) it is getting increasingly harder to defeat these attempts. What shall we do then? I say, go for the source of revenue, by blocking the crap out of ads and minimizing the amount that you are tracked as much as possible.
If you are still running windows, I would recommend looking at alternatives. Linux mint is a nice user friendly alternative, although I personally prefer arch. If you don't want to take the time to figure out how to install arch, check out instantOS. It installs everything for you, and has a nice design philosophy that makes it fairly simple for beginners to get started and allows room for power users to stretch out. I use it as my daily driver and have few issues.
Next, you'll want to install a more privacy focused browser. Most linux distros come with firfox preinstalled, and while I wouldn't recommend using it as-is, you can harden it by changing some settings and installing addons. for more information on that.
For those who want a more plug and play solution, I would recommend Librewolf. While it isn't the most user friendly (the most annoying thing being that it forgets your logins when you close down the browser) it's one of the best I've used so far. I currently use it as my daily driver, with stick firefox as a back up for those annoying websites that don't play nice. I use it with LocalCDN, which lowers the amount of request that go out for things like fonts and javascript libraries, CanvasBlocker, which helps protect against canvas fingerprinting, (more about that in the cover your tracks link above) and clearURLs, which removes the tracking info from urls, like amazon and instagram. I'd also like to recommend sponsorblock, which skips over those annoying youtube sponsors automatically.
Finally, remove uneeded accounts with sites like facebook, twitter, and google. I personally still have a google account, but only use it on my android phone and for youtube and gmail.
At the end of the day, becoming more privacy focused takes work, because so much has been done to make it inconvenient. You will need to do more research than reading my crappy little blog, but hopefully this can get you started. Good luck, and remember to always keep on top of your opsec! I'll try to answer any questions in the comments.
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people

Comments

What would your advice be for those who still rely on Windows for those times that Linux and other open source alternatives don't have the support for a problem's solution that Windows solves just because Windows is in everything? Sure, you can use older versions of Windows, but that comes with its own problems, and even if you do use said older versions, I've heard stories about people who's PCs suddenly just downloaded the Win10 installation files into their Win7/Win8.1 PC and then it updated to Win10 without prompting them to do so.

Ideally, devs would go and make a version of Windows XP that supports programs, plug-ins, DirectX versions, Vulkan, and everything that the newer OSes support that older OSes don't have. Unfortunately, source code leaks can't be used in re-creating alternatives that us users could use to still enjoy the benefits of tech in the modern day without the rest of the package that us users never asked for or want.
 
R
It comes back to having realistic expectations.

I wouldn't try to take a shower in the middle of a busy highway and expect nobody to see my arse.

Unless you own the Internet then expect zero privacy.
Keep everything private offline.

If you need to send private, work-related documents online, use encryption.
As for browsing porn, just assume everyone already knows your kinks.

Simple really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I only clicked here because I thought it said Piracy and the net....lol

People generally only see what you (willingly) post, but it always amazes me how often people will casually answer (bad) questions/polls with potentially damaging info., Whether it is accurate or not. Example: how many answered the poll: What are some thoughts you wish you didn't have (or something similar) the answer could be damaging even if responded as a joke, out of context.
 
@tomasowa
That comparison makes no sense.
Unless you own the Internet then expect zero privacy.
Keep everything private offline.
↑↓ These two quotes contradict each other. "The internet is never private" (You will never own the internet) ←→ "Use encryption to send […]"
If you need to send private, work-related documents online, use encryption.




Simple really.
WRONG! That is the most wrong part of your comment. Literally nothing on this complex topic is simple. I would even say it is one of the most complicated topics.
Unlike the funny(?) comparison with taking a shower in public, using the internet is part of the daily routine for many people. Sometimes one can even be forced to use the internet for things that worked offline before. The government may even force you to use some things. Blaming the people for using the net and expecting some privacy simultaneously is not a nice move.

I wouldn't accept a stalker in real life. Why should I tolerate stalkers on the internet? I don't get it. Just because it is impossible to reach perfect privacy when browsing, there is no reason for not using any kind of protection (and claim one should expect zero instead). Making people aware of how bad companies like Facebook, Google, Amazon… act, pointing out bad standard configuration and missing functionality in browser as well as presenting better (in the sense of privacy) alternatives – this is a good thing.

While this blog entry is far too short to cover everything like some kind of privacy handbook, it is nevertheless a good idea to remind of this problem.

It is possible to use multiple browsers or browser profiles for different tasks. A browser for shopping. A browser for nonsense. A browser for banking. This gives advertisers a hard time when trying to stalk. A separation of real identity and online identity is also nice.

It really depends what "threat" one is looking at. Automated trackers can be disabled, mislead and fooled. Some adversary directly targeting you/your computer… that is a different story. So is the problem of "hacking". I mean illegal access to databases of companies which compromises a lot of personal data (and the end user/victim has zero influence on this). More or less another reason for being careful what and how you use services.

Using privacy add-ons for protection, stop the usage of Google, Facebook,… as far as possible are effective measurements and not sharing any private details unless absolutely necessary should be the standard. I prefer using a shower curtain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
R
... I don't think you understand how comparisons work.

The first of my Comment you quoted is an analogy of how being online is, through posting and browsing.
The second is how to send things online.

Two very different things, and in neither did I say they were private.
So if I have to explain, then the problem is in your grasp of the Internet.
 
... I don't think you understand how comparisons work.
Thank you very much. What brought you to that insulting conclusion? I do know how comparisons work. Your analogy is just very weak in my opinion. It is a bad comparison. Browsing (and posting!) does not remotely have to be as little private as being stark naked and taking a shower in public.

The first of my Comment you quoted is an analogy of how being online is, through posting and browsing.
The second is how to send things online.

Two very different things, and if I have to explain then the problem is in your grasp of the Internet.
"If you don't see it my way, you didn't understand, you are the problem and I would have to explain (which I won't)." A second, plain insult – no more, no less. How about some actual arguments instead of throwing mud? While I'm certainly not the brightest person on earth, I'm also not a complete moron. It is not hard to understand your comment above – and after reading it, I came to the conclusion to disagree and provide some reasons for the disagreement.

Two different things, browsing+posting and sending documents, both done with the internet. "Zero privacy unless you own the internet" vs. "Private things can be done via internet."

There is not just casually browsing the web on the one side and sending top secret documents with symmetric encryption (pre-shared key) on the other. Condensing the topic into one flippant comparison and oversimplifying "The Internet" to two areas of application doesn't give proper consideration to it.
Because I lose control over everything uploaded to someone else's computer, I have to think before doing so. No matter if this is about private, potentially compromising photos or details one stores in the cloud, or statements on a social network (which can become problematic years later), or just automatically generated and uploaded browser data (easiest example: third-party cookies) which can be indirectly very powerful if it is enough.
  • The first thing can be easily solved by encrypting before upload and storing the key offline → Very good protection
  • The second: Think before posting – in doubt don't post → Effectiveness depends on user
  • The third: Stop the browser from collecting and automatically sharing data → Better than nothing and certainly more than zero.
=================

My arguments still stand:
  • The topic privacy on the internet is NOT – quote – "Simple really." The topic is multilayer and complex. Certainly more than two different things.
  • Protection against various threats is possible – without complete internet abstinence.
  • Different threats need different approaches to protect oneself. That fills books!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
R
... Again, you're pushing an assumption you made by your lonesome.
I certainly did not say Zero Privacy vs Private Things Done through the Internet.

It helps to have a better understanding of what people are actually saying before going on a rant, regardless how slow the day has been for you.

No Corporation nor Government believes the Internet is Private, so why should you when you have exponentially less resource to secure that premise; sending things through Encryption is the safest measure any normal person can do, though there is no guarantee that Data remains Private through its journey Online.

Big difference you seem to enjoy glossing over.

I try to keep things simple because only people who want to inflate their self-importance over-complicate explanations; it's both an oxymoron and an insult to the Recipient.

Everything is as complex as you want it to be, as reading my Comment has proven for you.
 
... Again, you're pushing an assumption you made by your lonesome. It helps to have a better understanding of what people are actually saying before going on a rant, regardless how slow the day has been for you.
I've enough of you telling me that I don't understand and I didn't rant here – what are you talking about? You provided an comment/opinion. I disagreed and provided a comment / reasons for disagreeing.

I try to keep things simple because only people who want to inflate their self-importance over-complicate explanations; it's both an oxymoron and an insult to the Recipient.
Sounds like a rhetoric trap – although I could be wrong. I will put it that way:
detailed consideration != over-complicate explanations

About the "glossing over" part: That made me laugh (literally). I do quite the opposite: I see a lot of risks on the internet an try my best to mitigate the problems. The short statement / rhetorical question
No Corporation nor Government believes the Internet is Private, so why should you[…]
is simply insufficient. It depends on who is the adversary and what is the goal. In my opinion this completely misses the point of this blog article which has the focus on ads, tracking and fingerprinting as well as the idea of questioning having accounts on various platforms.
If I would want to use your method, I would now repeat my self and say something like: "You don't seem to understand, that privacy on the internet is a complex topic and cannot be condensed into one or two sentences." But I will not use your method. I don't like this method. Maybe you are convinced that a single sentence is sufficient. Well… please accept it (I did this long ago): There is more than one opinion on the world – no matter how often you repeat yours.

Everything is as complex as you want it to be[…]
Nah. I'll rather not reply on this one.

===========
I have never said something like this on GBAtemp until now (I'm at least trying to be friendly to everyone and accept differences):
Since you seem to be unwilling to discuss things without insults, I will not continue. Statements like "by your lonesome" (which could easily be challenged) and "regardless how slow the day has been for you." are a 100% ad personan. I have no problems with discussion and no problems with other opinions – as long as they are provided ad res and with respect for the dialogue partner. Disagreement can even be helpful (an echo chamber certainly isn't) and make one thinking.
Constantly implying your dialogue partner is unable to understand and needle them with (albeit mild) insults, is not a basis for discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
R
... This is actually funny.
Usually, I'd stop and give you your out, but I had to ask; do you actually read your own Comments.

For someone who starts with insults, you sure do have a thin skin and a victim attitude.
This is probably where some introspection is overdue.

There are plenty of people here who like to troll and argue and do a better job of not sulking at counters.
I've actually enjoyed my exchange with them, for better or worse.

Maybe it's time you learn to take as good as you give, because your veneer of intellect is just that.
 
@Silent_Gunner There are registry edits and scripts you can run on Windows 10 in order to de-bloat and de-spook the operating system. There are many guides on how to do this online, but make sure that whatever one that you follow is trustworthy, and that you know what you're doing. If you're paying for antivirus, stop it. The best antivirus is common sense, and windows defender does a pretty good job these days. Evaluate the software that you install to make sure that you trust it, and choose a better browser than edge or chrome. As far as not having support for something in linux, you should look at Virtual Machines. They allow you to have your cake and eat it too, effectively allowing you to run full windows inside your linux box. Most machines have the specs to run them, so unless you're stuck on chromebook level hardware it's worth checking out. Virtualization works for just about everything except for certain anticheat in games, and even that can sometimes be defeated if you know what you're doing. SomeOrdinaryGamers on Youtube has some good videos about that. Sorry for the late reply, I was in the woods without internet for the weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
@DarkCoffe64 If only it were that simple. Unfortunately it is becoming increasingly impossible to participate in modern life without using the internet. It is possible to have privacy, but we have to hold onto what we have and lobby governments to give back what was taken. I understand that it is easy to look at the current state that the internet is in and claim that it is impossible, but I like to think otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
@N10A Mean, my was like a joke-reply, but yeah, its next to impossible to have true privacy online. Seeing how this world is built on lies and abusing others, me thinks those browsers and VPNs that claim privacy, not saving logs and crap like that, well, who knows if they ain't just lying?

Guess one way to do it is maybe have 2 online "alias", one in which you do your random crap that you don't care much about, and another "disconnected" from you for the more private stuff. -shrugs-
 
Well, firefox and its forks have a feature called "profiles" that allow you to create different browser settings for different uses. This allows you to have something similar to two identities, where as long as you keep your accounts dissociated from each profile they likely won't be linked.
As for vpns, a lot of them sell you on the idea that they make you "hack-proof" (no such thing) and that they hide your data. The second one can be true, but you have to make sure that whatever vpn you're using doesn't keep logs on your traffic, as any vpn based in the USA is required to do by law. As far as trust goes, you can look at history and the fact that if a "no-log vpn" turned out to be keeping logs, its reputation would be ruined. For web browsers, you can look at the source code of all the major ones yourself. If you don't feel like it, you can rest assured that they're probably some of the most audited pieces of software out there. What's in there is pretty well known. (As far as I know. To cover my own butt, these are large projects with tons of code. Is it possible that mozilla, for example, left some malicious code in a corner of firefox? Yes. Is it likely? No.)
 
I've been taking more of a look at privacy related addons and trying to protect my data and such, but man, it feels like a lost cause, given all the years of info these companies probably have on me already...it should be illegal
 
Honestly should, but there's no time like the present to stop the flow of information where possible. Advertisers rely on fresh information. I don't know about you, but my specific interests are changing all the time. Protecting your privacy now protects you in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Blog entry information

Author
N10A
Views
373
Comments
40
Last update

More entries in Personal Blogs

More entries from N10A

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9w_UTPpHjg