Here's one saying women shouldn't have access to an abortion even if they were rapped.
another one defending the removal of abortion access
Threatening violence
One of these things do not belong with the other. (hint, it's Homosexuality)
"free speeches" who is effectively defending Kiwi Farms. The known harassment website (among other things) that resulted in Higan's developer, Near, to commit suicide.
more defending of kiwi
And one using a documentary... by Malt Walsh..... let's just call him the dude that caused a children's hospital to get a bomb threat via stochastic terrorism, and saying that specific hospital name was doing sex surgeries and "mutilating children" Which the hospital multiple times over stated they don't do it. (a deep dive as to why you shouldn't bother with it https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/in-what-is-a-woman-matt-walsh-asks-a-question/) Tl;dr. even scientist call his documentary bogus.
Same quote. Same person. same bad take. doctors and therapists decide, along with parents and the kid. Oh and, one of these things is not like the other.