There isn't. It's only 9.9 and aboveI thought there was no browser nag on 9.2.
There isn't. It's only 9.9 and aboveI thought there was no browser nag on 9.2.
or if OOT could still be a entry pointNo reason, we can use BrowserHax to install Cubic Ninja cia, and then initialize Ninjhax.
I don't know I thought there was. I guess we will find out if somebody doesn't change their dns
Wow, somehow I remembered the right thing. Better to be safe than sorry, in case Nintendo somehow manages to apply the nag to 9.2/9.0.There isn't. It's only 9.9 and above
There isn't.I thought there was no browser nag on 9.2.
It's being called by dereferencing a function pointer. You shouldn't overflow any buffers of that's what your concern is. Edit: whoops. That's "shouldn't"Yeah, I was hoping that!
I wonder if there is a code limit. Also, it's a static method (for good reasons, too), so it makes access to other methods harder.
Yeah, but since he stated IronHax as his entrypoint, I figured he doesn't own OOT. It still could be a viable 9.2 entrypoint though.or if OOT could still be a entry point
Even if it was possible (which afaik isn't) they would've applied a patch by now.Wow, somehow I remembered the right thing. Better to be safe than sorry, in case Nintendo somehow manages to apply the nag to 9.2/9.0.
Yeah, i only have ironhax and menuhaxYeah, but since he stated IronHax as his entrypoint, I figured he doesn't own OOT. It still could be a viable 9.2 entrypoint though.
Oh, yeah, I know how it works. I'm just tinkering around with it because I canIt's being called by dereferencing a function pointer. You should overflow any buffers of that's what your concern is.
Yeah, but since he stated IronHax as his entrypoint, I figured he doesn't own OOT. It still could be a viable 9.2 entrypoint though.
Someone that didn't stole code and is really contributing. He's patching the SVC control table, so you can access all SVC calls, including 0x7B.Even if it was possible (which afaik isn't) they would've applied a patch by now.
Also, hate to be annoying and all but this fork of steveice10's memchunkhax2 is ahead? Can anyone guess what it's doing?
Oh wow. Props to him!Someone that didn't stole code and is really contributing. He's patching the SVC control table, so you can access all SVC calls, including 0x7B.
Come now stole is a harsh word don't you think why not say borrowed?Someone that didn't stole code and is really contributing. He's patching the SVC control table, so you can access all SVC calls, including 0x7B.
Someone that didn't stole code and is really contributing. He's patching the SVC control table, so you can access all SVC calls, including 0x7B.
I don't see any limits on it. Once the function kernel_entry function returns is when the kernel will move on. You'll probably have to write your own static methods to call from it, though. Your compiler is gonna bitch otherwise, as I'm sure you've discovered.Oh, yeah, I know how it works. I'm just tinkering around with it because I can
That's actually a part of the process you have to do for libkhax. Patching the SVC control table and setting the current process PID to 0.Oh wow. Props to him!
Yup, haha!I don't see any limits on it. Once the function kernel_entry function returns is when the kernel will move on. You'll probably have to write your own static methods to call from it, though. Your compiler is gonna bitch otherwise, as I'm sure you've discovered.
I saw that. Looks like it could be good! Thumbs up to the devs, definitely.Someone that didn't stole code and is really contributing. He's patching the SVC control table, so you can access all SVC calls, including 0x7B.