Don't complain about online worries if you used any kind of tool that could ruin stuff. Use at your own risk
Hi can you make it so we can also edit the abilities as well? Please please pleaseDon't complain about online worries if you used any kind of tool that could ruin stuff. Use at your own risk
Umm, you already canHi can you make it so we can also edit the abilities as well? Please please please
How? I tried changing Mew's Synchronize ability but it can't be done.Umm, you already can
Son, Mew has only 1 ability, if you wanna cheat go use PkHex.How? I tried changing Mew's Synchronize ability but it can't be done.
But isn't this considered cheating too? You're getting pokemon right off the bat that you won't normally be able to get and with perfect ivs and max evs on your preferred stats plus your preffered skill set...Son, Mew has only 1 ability, if you wanna cheat go use PkHex.
But isn't this considered cheating too? You're getting pokemon right off the bat that you won't normally be able to get and with perfect ivs and max evs on your preferred stats plus your preffered skill set...
If you rename PKHeX to PKHaX it will let you editWell, I shouldn't have called you a cheater, sorry for that. Second, I have no time for breeding or training so when I need EV to max in short time for X reason I just change that. Third, PkHex (as far as I know), lets you change Mew's ability to whatever so, try that.
Edit: No, not even PKHex. Sorry :/ You'll have to look for another editor
Oh... didn't knowIf you rename PKHeX to PKHaX it will let you edit
Good Morning!
I have a problem
Every time my Pokemons in the Pokemon Center, an image of the "Bulbasaur" appears instead of the same Pokemons. How can I solve this?
Can I be banned to go online to play?
thatcan easliy be fixed by making it when it clones pokemon reroll the pid and encryption constantNot right now but I'm paranoid GameFreak may eventually institute a PID/Encryption Constant check to make sure only one instance of a Pokémon can be uploaded at a time. Imagine trying to deposit one of your Pokémon on GTS or in the bank and getting an error saying that Pokémon already exists and couldn't be added? That would really suck.
I doubt they would ever do that considering a good amount of event pokemon have static PIDs (namely from Gen 4/5).Not right now but I'm paranoid GameFreak may eventually institute a PID/Encryption Constant check to make sure only one instance of a Pokémon can be uploaded at a time. Imagine trying to deposit one of your Pokémon on GTS or in the bank and getting an error saying that Pokémon already exists and couldn't be added? That would really suck.
Lol, yes, I mention that in the rest of the discussion and asked for it to be a feature in PKSM, which is why it was brought up in the first place. Thank you anyway though.thatcan easliy be fixed by making it when it clones pokemon reroll the pid and encryption constant
Ah, are their encryption constant the same too?I doubt they would ever do that considering a good amount of event pokemon have static PIDs (namely from Gen 4/5).
Yep. They are literally clones of each other. Here's a comprehensive listLol, yes, I mention that in the rest of the discussion and asked for it to be a feature in PKSM, which is why it was brought up in the first place. Thank you anyway though.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Ah, are their encryption constant the same too?
Well, as long as they don't simply add those particular PIDs and Encryption Constant pairs to a whitelist then I guess the worry is really low then.Yep. They are literally clones of each other.
Yeah, I just don't see them going that far in general. If they wanted to they could just ban everyone with CFW titles in use, but they don't. That and it's entirely possible (not probable) that two pokemon could have the same PID naturally. In Gen 6/7 the PID and the encryption constant are the same. Hence why you only need to reroll one or the other.Well, as long as they don't simply add those particular PIDs and Encryption Constant pairs to a whitelist then I guess the worry is really low then.
If i remenber correctly this problem was solved in the recet verison. You have an old verion?
You can try throwing it in the daycare real quick, I know for a fact it fixes checksum mismatches so it might fix that too.I already have the last compilation. But this error persists. What do I have to do after being with the last PKSM?
Piracy no support-y. Which part of this are people failing to understand?What about .nds save files?
I stated in the past that I'll never work on supporting backups. Just stick with PKHeX