S
Saiyan Lusitano
Guest
OP
Lesson here is: Anything below 10/10's or 5/5's is a bad score.
Nintendo must hate gbatemp then
7/10
In marketing, yes. But the game as a whole isn't necessarily worth those 10/10s that it's been getting.This is normal marketing, I don't get the title.
And that is your opinion.In marketing, yes. But the game as a whole isn't necessarily worth those 10/10s that it's been getting.
The framerate is just atrocious, even after the update it hasn't made a huge improvement overall. That's the point. When you're going to give a game a perfect score you need to consider everything.And that is your opinion.
Then no game gets a 10 as there are 0.1% and 1% lows in everything?The framerate is just atrocious, even after the update it hasn't made a huge improvement overall. That's the point. When you're going to give a game a perfect score you need to consider everything.
Entirely dependable on the game at hand.Then no game gets a 10 as there are 0.1% and 1% lows in everything?
Are you serious? Hard to tell.That's because it DOES deserve nothing but the perfect score. Reviews with anything else are just attention seeking trolls.
I legit don't know who this Jim Sterling is.Are you serious? Hard to tell.
In that aspect then you're saying Jim Sterling's review is a "attention seeking troll" which he isn't.
If frame rate determined scoring, then OoT would not have been king all this time.The framerate is just atrocious, even after the update it hasn't made a huge improvement overall. That's the point. When you're going to give a game a perfect score you need to consider everything.
A bit convenient to say that now.I legit don't know who this Jim Sterling is.
Times have changed so that's not exactly a good point to make.If frame rate determined scoring, then OoT would not have been king all this time.
https://gbatemp.net/threads/jim-ste...-score-zelda-botw-review.464420/#post-7173612I legit don't know who this Jim Sterling is.