I'm noticing there isn't an argument against this ruling that can't also be used as an argument against the draft in general.
The men's rights movement is largely misogynistic and usually supports inequality skewed in favor of men. Since men aren't a marginalized group, the movement typically doesn't address any real issues.
From what I have seen from the men's right activist group, most of the men seem to genuinely feel victimized and think that they are being treated unfairly by many groups. I think that this stunt they are pulling is misogynistic or at the very least is just intended to point out hypocrisies in feminism.
This might not apply to you, but I find it funny that people who talk about marginalized groups are usually very anti-man. They assume that men have no issues and are causing all of the problems of the world. I have never seen any evidence for this whatsoever. When I ask for evidence,they make valid claims about disparities in statistics and then use those claims as proof of marginalization. Example: Blacks are incarcerated disproportionately more than whites; therefore, blacks are marginalized. Statistical disparity is not a good measure of marginalization.
After they make these claims, they refuse to identify disparities that disagree with their world view. Here is a list of a few examples of why men may be marginalized:
1) Women are graduating at a higher rate than men from college
2) Way more men are in prison than women
3) Men typically get less custody of children than women
4) Men have more workplace deaths than women
5) Male athletes get paid proportionally less than women when you compare ticket sales (generally)
I guess my question to you is this--why do you assume women are a marginalized group while men aren't? I can understand the argument that neither group is marginalized. I can understand the argument that both groups are marginalized. I just can't understand how women can be viewed as marginalized in the US while men are not.