And even that isn't their work. Xci Loading is stolen code from nintendo. That's why it will never be implemented into Atmosphère. Either way, it requires sig patches. Also not included into Atmosphère.
Do you have any evidence to show that they can not do their own coding? How can you say that SXOS would not exist if it weren't for Atmosphere? It's just conjecture. Max Louarn, the alleged leader of TX has been in the hacking scene for over three decades. With his knowledge, connections, and wealth I'm sure he could get something put together if there wasn't an open source project to lean on. He was also allegedly behind Gateway 3DS too, which like it or not was the first team to get CFW running on a 3DS. The open source scene only got CFW running after they reverse engineered Gateway's kernel exploit.
Of course they're going to want their homebrew to be exclusive to their platform but there's no reason to think that TX tried to gain a monopoly over homebrew apps. TX donated to the prize pool for GBATemp's 2018 homebrew contest as did Axiogame (which is allegedly owned by Max Louarn who is allegedly the leader of TX). If TX wanted to only have homebrew on SXOS why not have their own contest with a bigger prize pool but make SXOS exclusivity one of the conditions?
Just because a company pays someone to make something doesn't mean they aren't developers. Are you going to claim that Apple didn't develop IOS because they paid people to do it?
XCI loading wouldn't require sigpatches because as far as the system is concerned there's a real cart in the slot. The data it sees when an XCI is mounted and when a cart is inserted is 100% identical, unlike when you install an NSP. Additionally XCI loading couldn't have been stolen from Nintendo because Nintendo doesn't have any XCI loading code, why would they even need it? During development they use NSPs which they install via dev menu and when they do need to load a physical cart they have special writable game cards that they can physically insert. What was stolen (according to hexkyz, I haven't verified this myself) were keys, card certs / headers, and the game card slot (Lotus) firmware. The Lotus firmware isn't even code though it's a precompiled binary that they embed.
No the program only generated the license file. Maybe I should start from scratch again, I wish the tx website and switch activation wasn’t broken as i own an official sxos pro
The TX site where you activate your license seems up, the sites where you used to buy the license are the ones that are down.
I'm not totally sure on this but I believe that if you have the license code that you bought (check your email if they sent it to you by mail) you can generate the license-request.dat from the same console that you did in the past and request a working license.dat again from the TX site.
Atm the TX main 'hub' site appears to be down but the SXOS site where you activate the license is up, if you cannot connect to it, it's because you are trying to access the wrong site or your ISP is blocking it.
lol no. You are bending the truth. A select few people had ARM9 code execution long before Gateway even appeared. Years after when Gateway came out other people started reverse engineering their exploit chain and that's when the ball started rolling. More and more people got access until it leaked. They are not the first to have a CFW or even just code execution but they certainly kickstarted it all outside of private circles.
Ok, that doesn't change the fact that they built a CFW before there were any open source alternatives to steal from, which is what that comment was in reference to.
@
SylverReZ:
@
Sicklyboy:
@
hitorikuroi:
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@
BakerMan:
