Personally, I'd say I'm pro-government action when it comes to public health and safety, like how if a sewer line were broken I'd call the city. It is kinda the function of government to impose law and standards so that we don't have crazy people lynching everybody they don't like or streaking across school playgrounds. Also, we're totally having a leftist orgy in your brain, sorry you can't unsee it.
I suppose I was a bit too generous assuming you'd take my question in good faith. You actually did reply by calling yourself evil by proxy. Do with that what you will, comrade. I just enjoy watching you be wrong and silly... which is often.
Do you know what else the Nazis used to think? That the sky was blue and that breathing was essential to their continued existence. Thanks for playing, please stop using this kind of perverse rhetoric to spread useless opinions.
Lets play something else, and see if you can follow along. We all would like to enjoy the freedom of eating in restaurants and going to movies without masks AND without possibly getting an illness that can lead to death. To promote this, we ask that people take a vaccine that is offered freely and rapidly in this country. Due to a targeted propaganda campaign by a party that promotes the status quo, many people are fed misinformation and refuse to volunteer for the vaccine AND refuse to quarantine or take safety precautions. Should the population at large suffer due to the selfish acts of the misinformed? Are the unobtrusive vaccinations a step too far for the freedoms of everyone to be restored safely?
Now, I'm willing to wager that, like several people in this thread, you'd say yes because my body my choice, but... well, for the greater good, I'm happy to say I don't care about your bodily autonomy if it can hurt or kill me or/and my loved ones and countrymen in tandem with irresponsible behavior. A cop can arrest an arsonist, so by all means, they should be able to arrest a bio-terrorist.
Sadly, this is a political topic that drags in a lot of other baggage. Comparisons get made, other factors get brought up, and the right wing viewpoints are 95% dead wrong. Sucks, but so it goes.
Congratulations, you were fortunate. Nobody likes to gamble on their health, however, and a vaccine will still do you good even after catching the virus.
For gods sake, please link your sources. Also, you missed the bit about how many cases per million there were of issues. Don't worry, I've got you covered. It sounds a lot less scary when you hear it is less than a percent of a percent chance, and for the record... I heard the warnings when I got my shot, as did my son.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiF5dPSreT0AhVXCTQIHS-cDUIQFnoECAkQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fda.gov%2Fmedia%2F154406%2Fdownload&usg=AOvVaw0F7O0pHKZvfqnjBjgViBWa
"Myocarditis reporting rates were 40.6 cases per million second doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines administered to males aged 12-29 years and 2.4 per million second doses administered to males aged ≥30 years; reporting rates among females in these age groups were 4.2 and 1.0 per million second doses, respectively. The highest reporting rates were among males aged 12-17 years and those aged 18-24 years (62.8 and 50.5 reported myocarditis cases per million second doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered, respectively)."