No.CrimzonEyed said:The two front cameras are actully one 3D camera
SoulSnatcher said:No.CrimzonEyed said:The two front cameras are actully one 3D camera
The two front cameras used together can produce a 3D picture. The camera used alone would just produce a normal picture.
I made a mistake with choice of words.CrimzonEyed said:http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/me.../horseman3d.jpgSoulSnatcher said:No.CrimzonEyed said:The two front cameras are actully one 3D camera
The two frontcameraslenses used together can produce a 3D picture. Thecameralens used alone would just produce a normal picture.
1 camera with 2 lenses
Clever, the 3DS has 2 cameras.CrimzonEyed said:SoulSnatcher said:No.CrimzonEyed said:The two front cameras are actully one 3D camera
The two front cameras used together can produce a 3D picture. The camera used alone would just produce a normal picture.
1 camera with 2 lenses
Meh, only Apple sells overpriced SH**.giratina16 said:Nintendo aren't known for mega extortionate prices. Besides I'm sure someone from Nintendo said it would cost under $200. I think it was someone from Nintendo.trumpet-205 said:I'm worried about the price.
duffmmann said:I would be shocked in the 3DS was as inexpensive as 200 dollars, Personally, I'd expect it to cost anywhere between 250 and 350 US dollars. And honestly any price within that range for this product is reasonable to me.
That, or the CrossFire hype.Westside said:I guess game consoles finally caught up with the SLI hype.
I think the 2nd PICA is going to be light. Because the lite or someother model from DMP is designed for menu UI. They've changed their site I can't find their old leaflets.Midna said:Assuming this is true, I'd guess either one GPU for the top and bottom screes, or one for each top screen angle.
Edit: http://www.my3dsnews.com/2010/09/07/extrap...igure-this-out/
This guy is smart. His estimate of $220 sounds about right.
I know Nintendo said they are going to do something smart with WiFi, but why would they install two WiFi modules ? You don't need two WiFi cards in your PC to be able to download 2 things at the same time. Even worse, two WiFi cards operating on the same wireless channel would probably interfere... unless the second one is going to be used in the sleep mode (e.g. consumes very small amounts of energy but offers very slow transfers).Juanmatron said:it is the original DS GPU to enable backwards compatibility on one side and to control the touch screen on the other
How the hell could a graphics chip control the touch screen ? In DS(i) it's done by ARM7, but it is a general-purpose CPU, and not a GPU.
On the other hand the diagram is to talk about two WiFi modules, which come in line with what they said to enhance wireless capabilities of the console.Juanmatron said:Basically 3DS CPU has enough power to emulate the DS hardware alone, which is why it has kept the GPU.
Where did you get this information from ?
Juanmatron
QUOTE said:How the hell could a graphics chip control the touch screen ? In DS(i) it's done by ARM7, but it is a general-purpose CPU, and not a GPU.
The ARM7 continues being in the 3DS but with higher clock speed and the same function that it has in DS and DSi (I/O and Sound Processing).
I know Nintendo said they are going to do something smart with WiFi, but why would they install two WiFi modules ? You don't need two WiFi cards in your PC to be able to download 2 things at the same time. Even worse, two WiFi cards operating on the same wireless channel would probably interfere... unless the second one is going to be used in the sleep mode (e.g. consumes very small amounts of energy but offers very slow transfers).QUOTE said:Where did you get this information from ?
You need a lot of performance for emulating a system and we are talking about a handheld that is limited by the length of the battery, putting a very powerful ARM core only for emulating DS would be a big mistake since the length of the battery will be completely reduced to the point that it would go below Nintendo standards in handheld systems. I am more than sure that the first GPU is PICA200 and is connected to the top screen, but the second GPU is DS GPU that gives that renders in the bottom screen in 3DS mode and in both screens in DS and DSi modes.
QUOTE
Urian1983 said:The ARM7 continues being in the 3DS but with higher clock speed and the same function that it has in DS and DSi (I/O and Sound Processing).
But there's just one CPU on the diagram ...?
The second module is 3G, not a second WiFi.Urian1983 said:putting a very powerful ARM core only for emulating DS would be a big mistake since the length of the battery will be completely reduced to the point that it would go below Nintendo standards in handheld systems. I am more than sure that the first GPU is PICA200 and is connected to the top screen, but the second GPU is DS GPU that gives that renders in the bottom screen in 3DS mode and in both screens in DS and DSi modes.
DS(i) = ARM9 + ARM7 + DS-GPU
3DS = ARM-something + DS-GPU + Pica200
Makes sense, provided they can emulate ARM7 in the software ("ARM-something" would be an overclocked ARM9 or something backwards-compatibile).
QUOTE(Urian1983 @ Sep 12 2010, 08:50 PM)