I'm rubbing my eyes in disbelief here.
Did you really just use a vacuum cleaner running linux, an overclocked toothbrush and webserver access to your wife (?!) as your final defence?
I accept defeat.
Exactly! Thank you, I’ll add.Looks like you forgot add sys-ftpd-light to the credits
You're still violating lots of licenses. And not to be rude but, you still think heat is the only issue. You're right about heat not being a big issue. There are lots of limits and things, but they didn't have in mind while designing that someone would push the chip, the components and the VRM/PSU that far out of spec. That far that it could, no, it will damage them. You have ignored every advice and opinion from us this far. And you don't keep your word either.
But! How many consoles have lost their functionality due to this modification? Not a single one. ZERO.
You didn't release the Erista mod yet and nor does anyone use these mods on Erista like that, that's the whole point of this. On Erista people use the RAM overclock only which has been deemed to be safe. How can you reply like this when the vast difference between Erista and Mariko is what's being discussed?
By the way KazushiMe even published his Mariko pack in the release section and he follows licenses properly: https://github.com/KazushiMe/Switch-OC-Suite/releases/tag/1.2.5.0
With this now an official release again I don't see a need for your pack to even exist.
compulsive lying, denying, deflecting, hyperbole, cognitive bias, playing the victim, dunning kruger effect, narcissism, the list goes on and on. probably shouldn't try to belittle others mental disabilities without evaluating your LONG list firstI'm used to being responsible for my words. And so far, I do not see any discrepancy between my words and my actions.
I listen to advices, but I do not take it on faith before I check it, find formulas, recount. If I didn’t take the advice, then I thought that advice was wrong. Am I wrong sometimes? Undoubtedly. But! How many consoles have lost their functionality due to this modification? Not a single one. ZERO. Well, what are the complaints against me? How about the presumption of innocence? If someone doesn't like the modification, I advise them to walk by and do something more useful than fooling me. I am tired of responding very politely to baseless accusations, which in their semantic meaning resemble the arguments of people who are afraid of vaccines and 5G communication towers. I am beginning to feel that my politeness is being abused.
I have described the potential risks quite explicitly. You have to be infinitely imbecile to overclock the chips without knowing the consequences. Since when have potential risks of harm become the reason why overclocking modifications should be banned on the forums? It seems to me that this can only occur to people with mental disabilities. Forgive me if I offended anyone. I have nothing against the disabled and the weak-minded.
I've tested it numerous times over the past two years. Each time giving the same results, high power draw, high temps, etc, it's even unpleasant at idle iirc. If you actually push it (you probably aren't, not much can take advantage of these speeds), I don't even think it's sustainable in Horizon, either the battery will die after an hour or so, you'll hit the thermal shutdown trip point, or shit will crash.How is it that nobody tests on Erista? What do you think I have been doing in the last weeks? What have 4PDA volunteers been doing in recent weeks? Or does someone think I am releasing a modification blindly?
By the time the modification is released, you will not find any problems with the license. The KazushiMe modification (only released yet just two hours ago) has not yet replaced the simplified alternative. If it will be downloaded more often, I will only be glad, it will indicate that the entry threshold has dropped significantly enough for the topic to be available to beginners.
Where can I find the iTotalJustice patches and what advantages do they have?KazushiMe stubbed ValidateAcidSignature so yes. But I recommend using the patches from iTotalJustice. Unless Cooler3d compiled the package himself and didn't do it. Patches will behave very weird if he didn't stub it.
I'm curious about this. How do you direct an overclock to run at a specific interval, say load time?I don't use the patches normally outside of giving the load time boost mode thing a light increase.
There's already boost mode implemented by Nintendo. You just edit the frequency it boosts too.I'm curious about this. How do you direct an overclock to run at a specific interval, say load time?
Sometime in 2019 (iirc in 7.0?) Nintendo added support for boosting the CPU clock to 1785MHz while reducing the GPU clock to 76MHz to help improve load time that devs can use if they wish to do so. I just patch the PerformanceConfigurations used by that to set 1989 instead of 1785I'm curious about this. How do you direct an overclock to run at a specific interval, say load time?
Yeah I was aware of Nintendo's boost mode. So, on an erista unit, is boosting past the default 1785 for mere seconds of loading a "big" risk?There's already boost mode implemented by Nintendo. You just edit the frequency it boosts too.
It's very low risk (on my console I don't even need to overvolt or any of that fun shit for the freq I use) which is why it's the only thing I use my patches for.Yeah I was aware of Nintendo's boost mode. So, on an erista unit, is boosting past the default 1785 for mere seconds of loading a "big" risk?
:edit: sounds as if the risk is minimal?
with the GPU being underclocked to compensate for it I'd say its much less of a riskYeah I was aware of Nintendo's boost mode. So, on an erista unit, is boosting past the default 1785 for mere seconds of loading a "big" risk?
:edit: sounds as if the risk is minimal?
It’s what we call a “buffered” workload - you’re redlining, but for a very insignificant amount of time and at a reduced GPU clock to compensate. I’d say the risk is minimal also.Yeah I was aware of Nintendo's boost mode. So, on an erista unit, is boosting past the default 1785 for mere seconds of loading a "big" risk?
:edit: sounds as if the risk is minimal?
#define MAX77812_PHASE31_CPU_I2C_ADDR 0x31 // 2 Outputs: 3-phase M1 + 1-phase M4. |