It looks like the Asus ROG in every regard, just compared to the price difference between them. Why do you need a monitor that costs more than my entire computer, though?
well i want to play in 1440p and something that's a bit higher than 60hz refresh rate and it has to be IPS. Oh yeah and i have an nvidia card(1080). The only monitors with a refresh rate above 60hz that are ips and 1440p are 144-165hz? I don't think even a 1080 can match its fps to 144-165hz so i would get tearing/stuttering which would mean i would need g-sync.
Last edited by Inukami,
Fair enough. As I said, if you're willing to shell out the cash, I'd go for the Asus one
I'd go with whichever is cheaper.
It's the same panel in both. QC on that panel is still shocking (dead pixels etc). Both Asus and Acer have also been complete trainwrecks with the QC on their high refresh IPS monitors. Both have awful RMAs, Asus will just give you someone else's return and Acer are just shit.
Both are great if you get a good one and a shitshow if you don't. So if you're going to run the risk, may as well be with the cheaper option.
It's the same panel in both. QC on that panel is still shocking (dead pixels etc). Both Asus and Acer have also been complete trainwrecks with the QC on their high refresh IPS monitors. Both have awful RMAs, Asus will just give you someone else's return and Acer are just shit.
Both are great if you get a good one and a shitshow if you don't. So if you're going to run the risk, may as well be with the cheaper option.
i just really wish amd could have come out with GPUs better than what the 400 series has to offer. Then i wouldn't have to pay a premium for gsync.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 5,716
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 35
- Location
- London, UK
- Website
- metalix.deviantart.com
- XP
- 1,904
- Country
Supposedly they will come out with better, but they released the mid-ranged model first to appeal to as much of the market as possible before they push the specs for the niche market of enthusiast gamers. It's their new strategy instead of underwhelming compared to nVidia every year.
Similar threads
-
- Portal
-
- Portal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
BigOnYa:
I want a handheld gaming system with a tablet sized screen, like a 8 or10" screen, with controllers that can detach like the Switch. -
@
BakerMan:
@BigOnYa i was legitimately trying to scratch my leg, this is reminding me of that cylinder post -
@
Scarlet:
I don't see the buzz about a square screen personally. I think there will be a review on the site within a few weeks though if you are interested.+1
-
@
Scarlet:
I've put down the money on the Odin 2 Mini since I just love that Vita form factor. Loved the power of the Odin 2 but the size always put me off, this one seems exactly what I've been wanting.
-
@
K3Nv2:
I don't care about the square screen it's just nice to hold something you don't have to stretch your arms a foots length -
@
K3Nv2:
All these things expecting to be super huge is overrated just run a type c cable to your TV if you want a big display or in my case screen mirror it
-
@
BigOnYa:
On the go tho I meant, I use my 10" tablet and a Bluetooth controller for retro gaming while sitting on my porch or on long car rides sometimes. Easier on my eyes than the Switch screen.
-
@
K3Nv2:
My point is we already have enough shit with big displays having something pocketable with up to ps2 would be fine on the go+1
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
Ken unless the games are made for that screen size most suck on a screen that size... Having a square screen and being brighter and higher res helps but it's not a cure all, text is tiny bullets are tiny, your.... Well lol -
-
-
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I swear if I hear "I don't usually do this on the first date" on more time... I am going to start counting
-
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
No no continue, I hear these things women say so often I decided to start counting
@
Psionic Roshambo:
No no continue, I hear these things women say so often I decided to start counting