Oh that's great that you can re-download them for free. ^
As for Sony, they seem to think they have a stanglehold on gaming and they can screw the average gamer as hard as they feel like and there is nothing they can do. I have an extensive PS1, and PS2 library, and as much as I would love to play the new MGS, and PS3's version of FF13. I really don't feel like it's worth it,
especially seeing how it runs like crap and from what I understand, devlopers can't stand working with it.
Up untill all the PS3 information started leaking out around E3 time, I never thought I would be more interested in a 360 than in a PS3.
Um.... What? Do you have a crystal ball that we normal forum-goers didn't get? Oh, and developers say its easier than working
on the PS2. And the PS2 is selling like hotcakes. Even now. And has the biggest game library. So I don't see what the big deal is. If a few developers feel like whining about having to do their jobs, so be it. It won't affect the PS3 at all.
Both nintendo, and microsoft shouldn't be concerned about beating sony, cause in the end sony will do that on their own. I just saw the ps3 on game spot running ridge racer plus afew others, and all the games were choppy as hell. This is what people are playing $2000 for? Well serves them right no system can run a game in a res of 1080, and not have to sacrifice something.
Â
P.S When people get their ps3 they are going to be pissedÂ