No one thinks THAT. But he is the best President we've had since Ronald Reagan. He didn't get us into a war, the economy was great, the borders were controlled, and we even had peace in the Middle East. Reagan couldn't even pull that off.
Good and bad Presidential runs are a matter of opinion, but Trump is largely considered by presidential analysts as being one of the worst Presidents in American history. I'll get the report if you'd like, but across the political spectrum his division and attacks on the integrity of American politics, elections, and the parties far outweigh any good he did as President. Also, saying that no President since Reagan pulled off what Trump did is almost certainly false.
Sure, he's a bit of an asshole, but, you kind-of have to be in that line of work.
Understatement of the century. Trump is infamous for direct, personal attacks on anyone who he perceives to be in his way--political rivals, political allies, former and current Presidents, businessmen, former employees, his former Vice President, jurors, judges, and court officials. And with a small army of aggressive followers willing to lay their lives for him, his threats create real consequences (January 6th being the best example, but far from the only one). His constant aggression spreads division and hatred across the board, both for himself and for the people he attacks. A good President should aim to unite and resolve, not divide and name-call. Trump is a businessman at heart, not a politician, and he plays politics like he does business without caring about any long-term consequences.
The thing is, at least he's OUR asshole, not China's.
I'm starting to become genuinely confused as to where you read your news. Trump has publicly and expressively praised dictatorships and autocracies, including Russia's Vladimir Putin and North Korea's Kim Jung Un. There was Russian political interference in 2016 to assist Trump's White House bid, which speaks to how important Trump (and Trump's values) is to Russia.
Besides this, Trump's goal right now is to get back into the power seat by any means necessary. The stakes couldn't be higher--he either becomes the most powerful entity in the country, gaining power and resources to carry out the rampant threats he's made to political opponents, or he likely goes to jail or faces other mountains of legal consequences. Transforming the United States into an autocracy a la Project 2025 is something Trump's alluded to in the past in order to remain in power. Trump is not a fan of democracy. He is a fan of dictatorship. He is a huge fan of political persecution. And he isn't afraid to say as much.
(via ballot harvesting, Dominion applying a multiplier to their closed-source algorithm, etc.)
This is delusional speculation that's been disproven hundreds of times over. Clearly, nothing will change your mind at this point, but keep in mind that it's very difficult to mutually respect someone who believes in completely baseless threads as a way to fit their own idealized narrative.
If Biden "wins" (via ballot harvesting, Dominion applying a multiplier to their closed-source algorithm, etc.), that won't happen. The U.S. will be a memory within two months.
And this is another sign of participation in baseless conspiracy. There's nothing that even remotely suggests that a Democratic victory this November will directly lead to the destruction of the country.
Thus far, all you've demonstrated is that you have no faith in U.S. elections, that Biden will single-handedly lead to the U.S.'s destruction, that you see Trump as a high-and-mighty President who's done more for the country than any President in decades, and that Trump is the victim of baseless political persecution. In a previous response, you also mistakenly referred to Trump's criminal trial as a lawsuit, called the charges against him "frivolous", and claimed that Nintendo was abusing the legal system for their own monopolistic gains.
Between these two posts, you have implicitly demonstrated a lack of fundamental understanding of legal proceedings, precedent and legal hierarchy, political prosecution, global economics, and (perhaps most notably) Mr. Trump himself. Everything in the last paragraph is either verifiably false or subjectively false and statistically improbable.
If you're going to debate, it would do you well to uncross your wires beforehand.