Expect looking into them the majority of what they've done has just been counter protest and most act of violence have been against publicly exposed Nazis. They actually haven't committed any real acts of terrorism.Causing personal violence, mass property damage, and rioting in the name of politcal affiliation or ideology is pretty much the definition of terrorism.
Don't think exactly like us? Didn't vote for a certain person? Try to voice an opinion other then our own? Well then you're a nazi and deserve to have violence committed against you.
These are the kind of loose definitions that antifa puts out and its extremely dangerous and doesn't belong in this country. A few states have even took things in their own hands like NJ which listed antifa as a domestic terror organization.
This bill in particular was introduced to the house, the Unmasking Antifa Act which is actually a modified version of laws that were used to crack down on the KKK in the pure sense or irony.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6054/text?format=txt
They themselves call them anti-facists but they are the real facists at the end of the day.
That's not what they are actually about. It's a movement to expose and to stop the very public raise of Nazism. They aren't targeting innocent people just walking down the street, they are going after people who've already revealed themselves as Nazis. I fail to see how going after people who've already publicly shown that they want to kill people is a problem.
I find it impressive that they are often called "Fascist" when in reality they show no Fascist ideologies. They aren't pushing for an authoritarian government that can't be criticized. They aren't pushing for extreme Nationalism. They aren't pushing for a military government. Despite what most people believe they aren't pushing for extreme government censorship. The only thing they are pushing for is exposing and stopping the raise of Alt-Right/Neo-Nazism that has become extremely public these days. The reason why this is a threat is because Trump is a Fascist.
Crying in court doesn't mean shit.Wow imagine if people were threatening you, and you had to get out of there ASAP.
Him admitting it on video, and a block away he waved a gun, and right before he accelerated by the crowd someone smacked the back of his truck What the heck do you think is going to happen? He might've thought he was being shot at. If you look at the footage, he's trying not to hit anyone until they start swarming him and hit his car.
He even cried when he realized someone had died. I highly doubt he meant for anyone to be hurt, he just got spooked after a gun-toting mob attacked his car and threatened his safety.
The actual video shows a completely different story as does the evidence before he went down there. The video doesn't show him running away from anyone, it shows him accelerating into the crowd of people with ample time to slow down, honk his horn, etc.. It was reported that he actually stopped at that road backed up into a 4-way intersection, and accelerated into that crowd of people. He could have taken literally any other way, but accelerated forward into a crowd of people instead. His claims directly contradict video evidence. You are trying to refute video evidence that directly contradicts your claims.
Also crying doesn't and claiming he was innocent doesn't mean he's some victim here. He had a history of Neo-Nazi views before this event and it's pretty clear that this was an attack of opportunity.
Expect he wasn't running from an angry mob, in fact there was no "angry mob" chasing anyone. You are acting like there this was an outright riot, when in reality it wasn't. He drove down there already fully aware that people on both sides had weapons, it's not like he was just some random person who just happened upon the protest and wasn't sure what was going on.haha yes don't run from an angry mob haha, just like, let them attack you, dude!
Of course there's still a lot of issues that you seem to be avoiding. One of the biggest issues being that if he was trying escape people, but didn't mean to run over a crowd of people, then why was there no attempt to warn the people he was running into? He didn't drive slower into the crowd holding his horn down like a normal person would if they were trying to gain attention from a crowd of people. Coupled with the fact that if he was being threatened, why did he back his car up a block before accelerating into the crowd of people? For someone trying to get away in a hurry, he sure wasn't in much of a hurry. The facts don't add up the claims. You want to pretend there's another side to this story, but the other side doesn't connect to reality.
Last edited by The Catboy,