speak about the upcoming exploit
Don't get your hopes up.I hope this thread will not be a flame-battlefield
This forum is a part of the internet, your hopes and dreams are invalid.The threads were closed because of the discussion coming off-topic.
Also http://gbatemp.net/threads/need-artist-s-for-3ds-homebrew-menu-logo.370130/page-37#post-5086799
The best we can all do is not being off-topic, nor insult everyone.
People need a place to rant (e.g. the "Why add anti-piracy to devolution thread?"). Just consider this thread the equivalent of that and leave it be. Otherwise A. more threads will be created or B. the rants will leak into 'real' threads.
So it's okay to utilize increased clock speed and a colour screen on a GBC, but it's not okay to utilize the increased clock speed of the new 3DS? Why? Because it's not as far apart from the original as the GBC was with the GB?
Everybody keeps spelling doom and gloom and how their 3DS'es are obsolete now - they're not obsolete. The darned thing is just getting a few exclusive games, just like the DSi and the GBC did before it - big whoop. 3DS games will continue to come out and if Nintendo has any sense, future games will be N3DS-Enhanced to provide a superior experience on the new revision. This does two things - it keeps the millions-strong fanbase around and it entices it to migrate to the new revision with stuff that just can't be played on the old one.
As I've said earlier in the thread - get the N3DS, System Transfer, sell old 3DS, bam! You've got yourself a superior system at a minimal expense - best of both worlds.
I don't think the GBC really fits with this as the Game Boy was around for 9 years before the GBC came around. That said, I don't think this spells doom and gloom. I'm hoping it will be like the DSi exclusives, as in games I don't care about. It's just the idea of a few exclusives for the new 3DS that I might want to play but not being enough to get me to drop another $160 kind of disappoints me. We'll see what happens, but overall I'm fine with the new 3DS. I think the extra buttons, second analog stick, and better battery life should have been part of the original one, so better late than never.So it's okay to utilize increased clock speed and a colour screen on a GBC, but it's not okay to utilize the increased clock speed of the new 3DS? Why? Because it's not as far apart from the original as the GBC was with the GB?
Everybody keeps spelling doom and gloom and how their 3DS'es are obsolete now - they're not obsolete. The darned thing is just getting a few exclusive games, just like the DSi and the GBC did before it - big whoop. 3DS games will continue to come out and if Nintendo has any sense, future games will be N3DS-Enhanced to provide a superior experience on the new revision. This does two things - it keeps the millions-strong fanbase around and it entices it to migrate to the new revision with stuff that just can't be played on the old one.
As I've said earlier in the thread - get the N3DS, System Transfer, sell old 3DS, bam! You've got yourself a superior system at a minimal expense - best of both worlds.
The DSi provided a superior experience in a lot of games. In Pokemon B&W it gave you the option to use voice chat, some other titles allowed the user to take photographs and use them in-game or otherwise utilize specific DSi hardware, some simply "ran much better", like Cop: The Recruit.The N3DS enhancement will not be using any hardware gimmick to enhance the games as the DSi did - but will, as you said it, provide a superior experience. If that doesn't render the 3DS obsolete... well, we're in a disagreement on that point.
I don't care for backwards compatibility in home consoles, but it's a big deal for me in handhelds. It's completely understandable between seriously major revisions (GBA to DS, though the DS kept GBA compatibility until the DSi), but I think like-systems should be compatible. I'm expecting to not have DS compatibility during Nintendo's next "real" new handheld, but as for now, I'm not quite ready to need THREE go to Nintendo handhelds to keep all bases covered (GBA SP, 3DS, and whatever comes next).
Backwards compatibility is a nice addition, but should never be a make-or-break feature - it's great to have if your original design can support it, but if it can't and the industry is nearing a technological jump, it should be skipped in favour of more recent, relevant technology. If not for the insistence on BC, perhaps the Wii U wouldn't be in nearly as much trouble as it is in now.I agree with this next system we might not have DS capability but as for home consoles bc is very important to me cause it means not having a bunch of old home consoles piling up everywhere especially when you need room to store things also I love the added two way street for home consoles its the very reason why I never touched my PS3.
Backwards compatibility is a nice addition, but should never be a make-or-break feature - it's great to have if your original design can support it, but if it can't and the industry is nearing a technological jump, it should be skipped in favour of more recent, relevant technology. If not for the insistence on BC, perhaps the Wii U wouldn't be in nearly as much trouble as it is now.
According to the Japanese website, the new-3DS is backwards compatible with DS games too.
The DSi provided a superior experience in a lot of games. In Pokemon B&W it gave you the option to use voice chat, some other titles allowed the user to take photographs and use them in-game or otherwise utilize specific DSi hardware, some simply "ran much better", like Cop: The Recruit.
I don't know why you dismiss DSiWare - is it because it'd downloadable software? If so, then that's a pretty backwards attitude in the 21st century, when Digital Distribution is pretty standard.
None of those things made the original DS fully obsolete - obsolete means "useless". Your 3DS is not obsolete just because an enhanced revision is coming out.