If they just used some package, they might not even know that they used signature patches or specific configs.
still. vanilla atmosphere will never get you banned. No matter what. For those who sent in the reports for sure are lying their ass off because this thread and the site believe using atmosphere online will get you banned no matter what
No blanking nothing, I've gone online before with SX OS back in the day several times by accident on sysnand and never got banned funny enough, however one time on atmosphere was enough for my dated old console, can already tell from that sentence alone that it's going to tilt so many people, so trigger warning, mind you I have done a lot of shit with it, anything BUT pirating video games, so miss me with that shit if you believe I did that, no sigpatch garbo either.
Custom osses like Android and Linux are 100% unable to ban you, since they don't touch the switches os partitions, unless you explicitly mount them and touch them yourself, so this can be rules out.
Lying is a two way street. If you want to accuse one group of people of doing something they didn't, then I reserve the right to accuse people of not being banned for hiding the fact that they are banned. Its a baseless accusation.
you may be the OP but there is still some inaccuracy in the data. of course its best to trust the information coming from the official Atmosphere discord server as they have more experience with this topic than a bunch of random people sending in data to a gbatemp thread
I fail to see why I or everyone else should automatically treat ReSwitched as gospel when it comes to Switch bans. Yes, they are very knowledgeable about the hardware but that information alone cannot be applied to bans as its Nintendo, not ReSwitched, who decide who gets banned. Furthermore, ReSwitched have been wrong in the past namely the modchips that TX produced for patched consoles so I'd treat their information on par with the community not greater.
when it comes to bans realistically all anybody can do is guess nobody other than Nintendo can ever truly know
That's probably your answer, it just took a while to catch up.. not everyone gets banned instantly
Tons of people, me included, connect to Nintendo's servers while in CFW. Those people do not get banned. Why would Nintendo ban a couple who use CFW on sysnand (seemingly at random) while leaving letting tens, maybe of hundreds, of thousands go unbanned?
You're quite literally contradicting yourself. That is not how Occam's Razor works at all. Occam's Razor assumes the least amount of assumptions and you just made an assumption on what these users may or may not have did. If you were truly citing Occam's Razor, then you wouldn't have to assume that there were activities these users report. In the case of Occam's Razor, its easier to accept that someone is telling the truth rather than lying or withholding information.
Nintendo uses these crazy thing called ban waves. nobody should ever assume they are safe if they ever connected to Nintendo servers while using cfw. through the years of gaming I've always seen this blind confidence and then people shocked when they find out they got banned while doing what they ASSUMED was safe.
Doubt it'll take 3-to 4 years either since this was back when sxos was still relevant and Emunand didn't exist.
its possible and has happened before with ban waves when everybody was convinced they were safe
What is more likely, that Nintendo bans a handful of people at random, or that people don't know how a hacked switch works? People on this very website prove daily they don't understand how their system works or what they are doing to it. Hell, even *you* are guilty of it, I've seen you tell people on multiple occasions to wipe their sd card when they had the slightest problem with their setup.
If you survived multiple ban waves, wouldn't you assume you're not banned?
That isn't even a question worth entertaining. Neither option is exclusive of the other. Nintendo can ban people randomly while users don't know how a hacked system works. The problem here is you do not have any evidence to disprove the data I have in my spreadsheet. You're just relying on the chance that they are wrong meaning its an assumption therefore Occam's Razor favors my data. Unless you have concrete evidence that people have outright lied in my spreadsheet or have a larger sample size, then your counterarguments amount to nothing.
yeah I do have a large sample size, everyone using Atmosphere yet the issue tracker isn't filled with people complaining about bans https://tooomm.github.io/github-release-stats/?username=Atmosphere-NX&repository=Atmosphere. Out of the hundreds of thousands of users, a large number of them go online just fine. Meanwhile you have what? A couple of gbatemp users saying they swear they didn't overlook a thing?
as I said this blind confidence repeats itself time and time again. its kind of crazy to me that anybody assumes they actually know how the system works
Now you just sound like a TX representative using other numbers to inflate the actual situation. Just because TX had a million downloads doesn't mean that's how many they sold. In a similar vein, the number of downloads on the Atmosphere repo doesn't reflect every single unbanned user. Only a small fraction of users report bans. Many people just don't care to report them. And why would you file an issue about a ban on Atmosphere's repo? Its not necessarily Atmosphere's fault that you got banned; its Nintendo's. They also have not banned every single pirate. There are plenty of people who have pirated but are not banned if you checked the spreadhsheet for a single second. I also don't have to tell you if I think there is a guy who just handpicks who to ban or not. My job is to simply report on the data that I collect.
@
NormalCatelol:
@
The Real Jdbye:
