Thoughts about Fedora 27

Hello everyone! This is Mat here, writing another technology related blog as a way to vent out and complain a bit. As Fedora 25 is reaching EoL, I thought it would be nice to write about Fedora 27.

I've been running Fedora 27 since its official release date (two weeks tomorrow), the upgrade process from F26 was pretty much flawless besides some small quirks with xfce4-terminal losing its font and dnfdragora crashing due to some icon issue, the former was easily fixed while I didn't care enough about the latter, so I just disabled it from startup (I would rather run dnf for upgrades myself). If it wasn't for those small quirks, I would say that the upgrade path for it is as good as Debian's.

So what did this upgrade bring new to the table? For a desktop user, not much, just updated packages, PipeWire (apparently GNOME only? Didn't notice a thing) and a new version of GNOME (which doesn't affect me, as I am running my handy Xfce setup), there was some interesting development in the server area as they keep pushing their modularization concept ahead, I find it pretty cool but I kinda worry how it is going to affect their desktop down the road. A cool thing about this release was the fact that it was the first Linux distro to ship Firefox 57, which I highly recommend checking out even if you are a hardcore Chrome user.

Sadly, this upgrade didn't solve two major issues I had with Fedora 26, which hurts my workflow in a petty, but annoying way. The first issue is power management, for some reason, my laptop always suspend when I close the lid, ignoring completely what settings I set up in Xfce's power manager. I need my laptop to lock the screen if closed while charging, as I use it as a "low power" download box while I'm sleeping, or just to avoid dirt on it while I am away for some time. The second issue is hibernation, if I try to hibernate it, it will boot up and load a blank desktop like a normal shutdown, apparently this is caused due to the lack of a "resume" flag in GRUB pointing to the swap partition from what I have seen in Bugzilla. I plan on fixing that down the road later, as I don't use hibernation often, but for a stable and mature distro, it is ridiculous to have that kind of issue in 2017.

z56yE11l.png


So that is it for Fedora! It is arguably the only distro that fits my needs atm (stable but cutting edge && not Arch), unless I go back to Debian and use its Testing branch, but I want something a bit more stable. If at least I could fix the issue with power management, it would be perfect for my use case. Solus piqued my interest but without Xfce, I am not sure if I would use it, unless MATE is as flexible and reliable as Xfce.

As something not related directly to Fedora, the RetroArch flatpak is still broken for keyboard users reeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people

Comments

I always liked Linux Mandrake, I think it turned into Fedora?

At any rate, I should check out Fedora if I ever get some more Linux friendly hardware... The machines I like to put it on are usually older machines too old to run modern Windows but at the same time they usually have some sort of issue running Linux of any flavor :( (usually WiFi on older stuff, but sometimes the GPU is an issue as well.)

Someday lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
S
Holy shit, I've never seen the modern Fedora before, it's breathtaking! Do you think a Windows user could switch to it fairly seamlessly?
(no Windows leaves room for a step up in graphics cards :O )
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Psionic, nah, Fedora came from OG Red Hat before it became Red Hat Enterprise lol, IMO Fedora improved a lot since the last time I used it in 2013, I used to avoid it back then, but nowadays I find it surprisingly nice and worth a shot.

SketchyPixel, believe it or not, this is actually a non-standard setup :P Default Fedora uses GNOME3, which is also quite nice looking (I just prefer to use lighter alternatives), just install Adapta GTK theme and Papirus Icon Theme and you will have a similar setup to mine. It is pretty easy to transition IMO, if you use GNOME, you just need to install some extensions to get a Windows-like taskbar (or a macOS-like one if you want), if you use XFCE like me, it will take a bit more setup (installing some nice themes to avoid looking like 90s, adding Whisker Menu and removing the second taskbar), it doesn't take too long, but it can be a bit daunting. It is no Arch, but it doesn't hand hold you and you need to add third party repos (RPMFusion) for "non-free" (proprietary, as in, Steam, Spotify, NVIDIA drivers, etc) apps and US patented stuff. If you don't mind reading a bit and experimenting, it is totally worth trying it out, else try Ubuntu for something more user friendly out of the box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Blog entry information

Author
matpower
Views
274
Comments
10
Last update

More entries in Personal Blogs

More entries from matpower

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    AncientBoi @ AncientBoi: wait +1