Why the hell does Baxter's Proxima read like a sequal?

It seems that there are many references to events that have been in the past and situations that are left unexplained or even impossibilities that are hinted at but never explained. I do recognize the "The protagonist doesn't know WTF is going on and doesn't really give a shit" vibe is intentional, but it seems like it veers too much into the "left unexplained" category.

Perhaps I'm just spoiled by Pratchett's Discworld series eventually developing a narrative for all the details, but it is irritating to be led on by all these tantalizing mysteries only for them to be left unexplained. And now I have to read the actual sequel to find out why the hell there's Romans with zeppelins (why are there always zeppelins in alternate societies?), but I suppose that won't be explained either.

Comments

It says in the title. Someone named Baxter has a book called Proxima.
One search later
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17983396-proxima

I have not read it but "It seems that there are many references to events that have been in the past". Look up a phrase call in medias res, short version is it is a way of writing that leaves you to try to figure out something about the world rather than exposition dumps. Other things might well be sequel hooks.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Futurdreamz
Views
141
Comments
4
Last update

More entries in Personal Blogs

More entries from Futurdreamz

General chit-chat
Help Users
    The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye: my music collection is just too big, i require variety