Fox is mainstream media and all news reporting from any source regardless of TV, radio, print is tailored to attract a consuming audience. But the video footage was provided directly by the US Congress, so pointing out that this footage is being shown on Fox News doesn't make it disappear or irrelevant.
I see reading comprehension's not your strong point. As for reply #7, that's what I was replying to, and I said he makes a fair point ... if all the footage is considered. Not just what the Jan 6 committee cherry picked, nor just what Tucker Carlson cherry picked, but ALL of it. Unfortunately, not many people have 40,000 hours of time available. So, what we get instead is one side's biased edits, vs. another side's biased edits. That's pretty much how a trial works, so I don't see a problem with Carlson now presenting choice selections of footage that show there's more to the story than we have been previously told, when the Jan 6 committee released only footage that depicted what they wanted seen.
You probably don't know much about criminal procedure either, but withholding evidence from a criminal defendant, even if it is only potentially exculpatory, is a big no-no. See Brady v. Maryland. So if the persons who have been tried and convicted, and are now in jail, were not provided all of this footage, they may have grounds to have their convictions reversed.