Wow, you are.... Ok, I'll try to be polite, but you're making it difficult.The console is not bricked, what are you talking about ?
Yes, if you use an unauthorized software or modchip that enables said software you can brick your console (by deleting critical files for example), everyone knows that.Wow, you are.... Ok, I'll try to be polite, but you're making it difficult.
This thread is about bans. Bans that happen after people crack their switches. Some said that that is against the law. Those people are dumb, because it is written on the box that "The use of an unauthorized device or software that enables technical modification may render this software or your Nintendo Switch system permanently unplayable."
But some guys here are so stupid that they think it was against the law if Nintendo bans them. Of course it is not. It is even written on the box.Yes, if you use an unauthorized software or modchip that enables said software you can brick your console (by deleting critical files for example), everyone knows that.
https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/unfair-treatment/unfair-contract-terms/index_en.htmStop laughing. Sure, not all agreements are contracts, but in this case the ToS are a contract. I never said that all agreements were contracts.
I've been trying to explain how a certain situation (the L.A noire thing) can turn a ban into an act against the lawBut some guys here are so stupid that they think it was against the law if Nintendo bans them. Of course it is not. It is even written on the box.
What does that have to do with it?
Yes, you tried - and failed. As you can see on the box, it clearly says that that can happen. Obviously it is NOT against the law. Thanks for proving yourself wrong!I've been trying to explain how a certain situation (the L.A noire thing) can turn a ban to an act against the law
If ToS is unfair, it can be void. And since we rinse and repeat in this topic at the moment. ToS is not legally binding in my country. So it's per default void.What does that have to do with it?
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Yes, you tried - and failed. As you can see on the box, it clearly says that that can happen. Obviously it is NOT against the law. Thanks for proving yourself wrong!
It shows that TOS is not above the law. Also if TOS would be legally binding then you wouldn't have cases like theseWhat does that have to do with it?
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Yes, you tried - and failed. As you can see on the box, it clearly says that that can happen. Obviously it is NOT against the law. Thanks for proving yourself wrong!
And what are the unfair terms of Nintendo?
Look, I've already told you that everyone knows and understand what's written in the box, it just says some generic info "using modchips or homebrew can brick your console" this has nothing to do with Online bans.Yes, you tried - and failed. As you can see on the box, it clearly says that that can happen. Obviously it is NOT against the law. Thanks for proving yourself wrong!
Looks like this thread went off topic.
So in the end there is nothing europeans can do?
I'm still not defending the bans of the console. I'm defending a possible ban of users accounts on all digital platforms.And what are the unfair terms of Nintendo?
Seriously guys, you're defending the indefensible. It's piracy. If Sony had ban someone for hacking the PS4, nobody would have spoken.
Ok, but that has nothing to do with this case, so why are you bringing this up?!If ToS is unfair, it can be void.
Yes, as long as people say wrong things, others like me will correct them.And since we rinse and repeat in this topic at the moment.
That would mean that you don't have any right at all to use Nintendo's online service. If you never had the right in the first place, you cannot complain if they deny you access.ToS is not legally binding in my country. So it's per default void.
Then they aren't allowed to sell their product here at all. So still, until you actually have something that provide substantial counter-pointers. I will just ignore you. You literally just throw stuff out and hope it sticks.Ok, but that has nothing to do with this case, so why are you bringing this up?!
Yes, as long as people say wrong things, others like me will correct them.
That would mean that you don't have any right at all to use Nintendo's online service. If you never had the right in the first place, you cannot complain if they deny you access.
It's unfair terms because not all users that have hacked the Switch have relied to piracy.And what are the unfair terms of Nintendo?
Seriously guys, you're defending the indefensible. It's piracy. If Sony had ban someone for hacking the PS4, nobody would have spoken.
if TOS would be legally binding then you wouldn't have cases like these
https://www.forbrukerradet.no/side/nintendo-breaking-the-law/
with that I agreeToS are legally binding, but only if they are not against the law. Every contract must not violate the law. This is nothing special.
What does cancelling a pre-ordered game have to do with bans?