uPlay+ is Ubisoft’s new game subscription service

FD5C88F7-E262-452B-BCF7-473810E5EF5F.jpeg

Need more gaming subscription services in your life? Because Ubisoft has just revealed their foray into the video game subscription service model. It’s called uPlay+, and offers over a hundred different titles, for $14.99 a month. You’ll also get access to upcoming games such as Ghost Recon: Breakpoint and Watch Dogs: Legion, as well as all DLCs. Classic games are offered too, with Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, and Beyond Good and Evil being shown during the announcement. uPlay+ will be available starting September 3rd, but if you pre-register now, you’ll be able to play free for a limited time. uPlay+ will be on PC when it launches, and Stadia later on in 2020.

:arrow: Source
 

GameSystem

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
606
Trophies
1
XP
1,733
Country
United States
Doesn't actually sound like that bad of a deal. Think Gamefly, but there doesn't seem to be a limit to how many games you can play per month at once. I guess it's good for people with a ton of free time and can play/beat multiple games in 30 days. Beats paying for a game outright.
 

Hells Malice

Are you a bully?
Member
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
7,122
Trophies
3
Age
32
XP
9,272
Country
Canada
another one.

It's an incredibly good business idea that actually benefits consumers too. Win/win. For less casual gamers it lets people play brand new games for only $15 which is pretty crazy. It's almost like the good ol' rental days, just with no restrictions and 100+ other games to boot. Very smart.
 

kuwanger

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Messages
1,510
Trophies
0
XP
1,783
Country
United States
It's almost like the good ol' rental days, just with no restrictions and 100+ other games to boot. Very smart.

It's like the good ol' rental days, but you have to buy n subscriptions from n companies to actually play all the latest titles. It's the same catastrophe that Netflix is devolving to as companies have decided it's better to splinter off to their own subscription service. Now, if you only play the latest games to beat them (which is very much what rentals was often about) it might still be a great deal. The rest of us more casual gamers who will wait 5+ years to play a game, $15/month is terrible. $5/month-$10/month total is probably about the limit before it's better to just buy older game bundles. I mean, look at how many games are sold dirt cheap right when a new release is about to announced to "drum up interest". *shrug*

At least it looks like it won't be streaming on the PC?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted_413010

Hells Malice

Are you a bully?
Member
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
7,122
Trophies
3
Age
32
XP
9,272
Country
Canada
It's like the good ol' rental days, but you have to buy n subscriptions from n companies to actually play all the latest titles. It's the same catastrophe that Netflix is devolving to as companies have decided it's better to splinter off to their own subscription service. Now, if you only play the latest games to beat them (which is very much what rentals was often about) it might still be a great deal. The rest of us more casual gamers who will wait 5+ years to play a game, $15/month is terrible. $5/month-$10/month total is probably about the limit before it's better to just buy older game bundles. I mean, look at how many games are sold dirt cheap right when a new release is about to announced to "drum up interest". *shrug*

At least it looks like it won't be streaming on the PC?

No "casual" gamer waits 5+ years LOL. Are you on drugs? Casual gamers are the ones consuming new media at its freshest. Casual doesn't mean occasional. There's a reason games like Madden sell like hotcakes every single year, it captures the casual audience. A more invested gamer would be more likely to research previous titles or market pricing trends. A more invested gamer is the one more likely to research older games to play and if it's worth getting the new one (because with Sports games, it never is).

You're not a "casual" gamer. You're cheap. Big difference.

$15 is fantastic. Absolutely fantastic. Someone sees $80 (in Canada, $60 USD), and might be taken aback. But $15? Fuck that's easy. Thats an hour or two of work for most people. People just keep subscribed to the service and let it run. They constantly get new games to play without huge bills attached. Win/win. It also more easily exposes casual gamers to older games thanks to the simplicity of the catalog and having every game at your fingertips.

And of course for invested gamers, the benefits are great. Want Watch Dogs 3 but know you'll beat it in a week? Buy a month of uplay+ for $15, beat it, unsub. It means a lot of people won't outright buy the game, but it also means cheapasses hyped for the game who weren't going to buy it (and more likely to buy it used) will spend the $15 to play it.

Like I said. It's a win/win for consumers and the company. It's an incredibly good tactic.


Also in regards to rentals, I paid like $10 for a week long rental. I don't give half a shit if this is just subscribing to a single publisher. A single publisher like Ubisoft or EA has a HUGE catalog of games for the price. 1000% better than rentals ever were.
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,786
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,689
Country
United States
So at this point, we're up to like $60/month if you want to subscribe to all these different streaming services. Which is enough to buy you 1-6 games for that month anyway. Absolutely asinine. Apparently publishers are just tired of people owning their games.
 
Last edited by Xzi,

00technocolor00

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
73
Trophies
0
Age
26
XP
128
Country
United States
Like the netflix competitors these services are kinda just cannibalizing each other. Wouldn't it be far more profitable if all these companies joined forces to make one ultimate subscription service? Yo itd be esp crazy if that was all available to stream through something like googles stradia or whatever. Wouldn't need a $500+ pc that will need hardware updates every 3-5 years to play the latest games. That'd limit piracy extremely, entirely for games exclusive to that service with no retail copy barring some dramatic insane hacking heist. Seriously itd be $$$$
 

x65943

pronouns big/pingus
Supervisor
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
6,260
Trophies
3
Location
ΗΠΑ
XP
27,013
Country
United States
Makes sense on PC. On Stadia, not so much - it's more expensive than an actual Stadia sub, lol
Stadia is $10 just for the service which has 1 game right now

Additional games cost money - so you would have to pay for both subscriptions to play on stadia
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
755
Trophies
0
XP
957
Country
United Kingdom
So at this point, we're up to like $60/month if you want to subscribe to all these different streaming services. Which is enough to buy you 1-6 games for that month anyway. Absolutely asinine. Apparently publishers are just tired of people owning their games.
What arse have you been up?
This isn't a cloud service /s
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @mthrnite, Cheetah Girls, the sequel to Action 52's Cheetah Men.
    +2
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Pokemon Black I played that one a lot
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Honestly never messed with Pokémon on ds much
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    I played pokemon once, was bored, never tried again
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Oh Dragon Quest IX
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Spent like 5 hours on switch one never touched it again
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Sentinel of the stary skies
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Ds is 20 years old this year
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    So MJ no longer wants to play with it?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    He put it down when the 3ds came out
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @K3Nv2, RIP Felix does great videos on the PS3 yellow-light-of-death.
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    Eventhough the New 3DS XL is more powerful, I still feel like the DS Lite was a more polished system. It's a real shame that it never got an XL variant keeping the GBA slot. You'd have to go on AliExpress and buy an ML shell to give a DS phat the unofficial "DS Lite" treatment, and that's the best we'll ever get I'm afraid.
    +1
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    The phat model had amazingly loud speakers tho.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @Jayro, I don't see whats so special about the DS ML, its just a DS lite in a phat shell. At least the phat model had louder speakers, whereas the lite has a much better screen.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's a DS Lite in a slightly bigger DS Lite shell.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's not a Nintendo / iQue official product, it's a 3rd party custom.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite
    for people with beefy hands.
    +1
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I have yaoi anime hands, very lorge but slender.
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I'm Slenderman.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I have hands.
    Veho @ Veho: +1