First of all, can you please give a reliable source for this 3/10 immigrant refusal static?
The only article I found was from the nypost, and they did not list a source.
I also could not find this statistic on the ICE website, so if you have access to it, please share.
https://www.ice.gov/coronavirus#detStat
https://www.axios.com/ice-immigrants-covid-vaccine-ee9406fe-7d83-4dce-b5be-c158e0d39f81.html
https://nypost.com/2021/07/15/30-percent-of-migrants-in-border-facilities-refused-covid-shot-report/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ps...-immigrants-remain-unvaccinated-thats-correct
We may have the same NYpost article. The ICE website also does not specifically state the 30%, however it has solid numbers should you decide to check the math. I'm really hoping you spy the Fox News article.
Secondly, you argue that we shouldn't administer shots to people with no US medical history, for their own safety.
I agree that people are affected differently and should take their own risk assessment.
If this is the case, why should we mandate a vaccine with no medical history at all?
Did you know that companies are not liable for problems you incur from these unvetted vaccines?
Last I heard the U.S. government still has yet to push Covid vaccine mandates. They've pushed mask mandates, but unless I've missed something only companies, the private sector, are pushing mask mandates and weekly viral testing. So, maybe complain about that instead?
If you have received any of these shots, you are the experiment.
You are the test.
You won't know the true effect for 10+ years, long after this thread has died.
You're absolutely right. So far, though, I'm vaccinated and... I'm doing pretty good. I also got all my other vaccines too. Haven't mutated or been violently tracked either.
Vaccinated people still get and spread COVID. What is your argument, exactly?What benefit is there in testing unvaccinated but not the vaccinated?
God you're smart. You must be thinking the Covid vaccine is like the polio vaccine. You come across as someone who would refuse the polio vaccine and then get polio, and then blame science again. I hope I'm just reading what you've written wrong.
The goal is clear: social division through government sanction.
Uh huh. The Covid testing and mask mandates are the way to go for social division. Not civil rights, education, economy political affiliation, stuff like that. The government is using masks to divide us.
COVID has a very low morality rate. It isn't eating up the lives of citizens.
You got that from Wikipedia, didn't you? No, but really. Any, every virus that has run rampant over the history of mankind has had government intervention at some point. If they didn't, we'd probably still have Polio. Or the Bubonic plague.
Ironically, he government mandated shut downs destroyed more lives than COVID ever could have.
Many small businesses had to close up during this period, and they cannot reopen because they weren't big enough to absorb the hit.
Out of work, live savings were swallowed by a country not allowed to work.
Big corporations, on the other hand, were allowed to stay open and absorb all of the business of these small stores.
Yes, because big businesses have politicians in their pockets and vice versa. That's why some companies still have monopolies, which are technically outlawed. That's an unfortunate side effect, but not necessarily derived because of. Small businesses couldn't survive because of larger corporations providing convenience of things like delivery during the shutdown, something mom n pops style businesses couldn't compete with. Maybe instead of blaming the government, you should look at companies like Amazon that carve themselves such an edge that they freely dominate thousands of other start ups. Why didn't Amazon donate to keep these businesses open would be a better question to ask in the face of closing businesses during the pandemic.
Thanks for the hat tip, but the phrase is "tip your hand".
The expression refers to poker, where you want to keep the cards in your hand a secret.
Tipping your hand means to reveal your true intentions, which you have done again.
Thanks for that. Despite knowing what the actual quote referred to (it's actually part of my job to know stuff like), I was going in a different, more condescending direction. As far as showing my true intentions? I've never tried to hide my intentions. I think I'm pretty clear: hypocrisy is annoying, and some people just aren't fit to live in a progressive society. Anything else you think I'm hiding?
Do you believe in political genocide?
I say live and let live, and you want people to die because they don't agree with you.
Actually you're putting way too much into the effort I may or may not have in wanting people to actively die. I really don't care who lives or dies outside of my loved ones; at the end of the day, it's ultimately your choice whether you want to contribute to a better society or to just die off at the back of the pack. But I'll make sure my kids and loved ones get vaccinated and stay safe; if you and yours die off before you've really experienced the majority of your life, so be it.
Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. I literally can't wait for your response.