Gamevice's patent complaints against Nintendo to be investigated by the USITC

HKPB2.jpg

The Gamevice saga continues. Not content with losing in their infringement case last month, Gamevice dredged their patent claims against Nintendo up again, in hopes of actually winning this time around. After filing with the United States International Trade Commission, the USITC will be moving forward by investigating the claims made by Gamevice that Nintendo is infringing upon their patent of a tablet system with detachable controllers. Previously, the Patent Trial and Appeal board threw out Gamevice's case after investigation, but this latest announcement means that while the merit of the case itself hasn't been determined, a judge will still be assigned to investigate the validity of the claims, even though the US Patent and Trademark Office already ruled that devices that attach video game controllers to tablets is "unpatentable".

By instituting this investigation (337-TA-1197), the USITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The USITC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge will assign the case to one of the USITC’s administrative law judges (ALJ), who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. The ALJ will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.

:arrow: Source
 

raxadian

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
4,430
Trophies
1
Age
41
XP
4,646
Country
Argentina
Technically speaking at least they made a device that works even if making games work with it is hard.

I find the patent system in the USA to be really stupid, you literally can patent stuff that already exists if you reword things a bit.

Heck the Wiimote was just a remote control, you know the thing TV's had for many decades already? And Nintendo still got sued over it.
 

GBADWB

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
283
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
1,803
Country
United States
You can't patent a design. You can trademark it.

Design Patents and Trademarks are completely different things, and is enforced differently. Trademarks have to be constantly be in use in order to be used to sell something (a trademark is always attached to some product, and is usually not the product itself). A design patent is a 2d or 3d design that lasts up to 15 years upon grant.

Design patent = the design is the product you are selling. Trademark = a design used to sell a specific product (e.g a character based snack or toy)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ryccardo

guisadop

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
656
Trophies
1
XP
2,180
Country
Brazil
unfortunately that's the kind of stuff they can't win. big corporations like nintendo would never lose simply because they're too big
 

RedBlueGreen

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
2,026
Trophies
1
XP
2,538
Country
Canada
They should really be careful with these frivolous patent suits. Sooner or later they're going to get a very bad reputation and their cases will be thrown out immediately.

I remember hearing about some random woman who made thousands of frivolous lawsuits and now she's not allowed to file civil suits against anyone. If they're not careful something similar could happen, I wouldn't be surprised if at the very least they end up being held in contempt of court.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    BigOnYa @ BigOnYa: Caller -"Everytime I start a Pc game on my S24, playing on a external monitor, someone calls or...