Your inclusion of "Hitler never even visited a death camp" implies that he didn't really know what was going on or at least isn't really to blame for the holocaust. The subsequent statement about Himmler reinforces that.
But you're right, you didn't explicitly state that. I am very tired and misread what you wrote. My apologies.
what parts of the literature that I cited were edited?
Apology accepted.
All literature gets revisited and edited.
All happens before printing of said works.
This is true for decades if not hundreds of years worth of literature.
If you're just going to write a book about history, nobody would bother printing it.
If you however focus on one thing and leave minor details out of it, the work becomes a lot more attractive.
Pretty much the same as how the media works.
People want sensation, not boring facts ;/
So limiting personal liberties and de-valuing human life? Sounds about right.
Anyway, if you were going to compare a president to Hitler, it would be George W. Bush. The way he snatched up a bunch of emergency powers in the wake of disaster is very reminiscent of both Julius Caesar and Hitler. Thankfully, he wasn't bright enough to follow through with it.
That can be said about pretty much everything.
I can't donate blood cus homosexual.
I'm only allowed to donate blood after abstaining from sexual contact for a year.
Isn't that devaluing someones life?
Isn't that limiting a personal liberty?
;')