In short, no.
I've been thinking lately about the strategic value of releasing iosuhax without the necessary exploit(s) to run any of it, and have reached the rather disappointing conclusion that it is more of an insurance policy than it is an actual contribution to the development of IOSU tools. Someone looking to profit financially from CFW (a la Gateway) would have most of their "product" publicly available because of this move, meaning if they were trying to sell the exploit with the necessary CFW procedures, the exploit would almost immediately become public, and combined with these tools, would make their product irrelevant. This would also allow unsigned titles to be installed directly to the system menu (loadiine would be irrelevant) so any dev who happens to be anti-piracy (just about all of them) would be even less inclined to release an IOSU exploit as the tools for unhinged piracy have already been made available. It seems like a stalemate to insure no one releases anything because there's either no incentive or counter-incentives for all parties
So basically, in the end, no one can do anything without screwing each other over?