Shinigami357 said:
Technically, video games are a creation of fiction too. Dracula is actually a bit more real than say, Mario, because he was based more-or-less on this crazy dude in Transylvania (Vlad teh Impaler). I can understand changing some of it if it is for the sake of continuity, but sparkling is just, I dunno, way too lame for a plot device, and more of a "look this is a non-threatening vampire, 15 year-olds" thing. I think the only time they used it for any effect was when he was gonna go out butt-naked (so I've heard) in the middle of some city somewhere, and he'll get punished for it.
The concept of a "vampire" predates Vlad and the Dracula-era by an enormously large amount of time, and contrary to common belief, the character Dracula was not based on Vlad Tepes (except in name). This bringing up my point again, Stoker's
Dracula (and the works which inspired it) was a completely new and different take on vampires which hadn't really been seen prior to the 19th century.
Mario, on the other hand, is a definitive character and more of a pop culture reference.