Well I said yet, they could add support to it.
I agree with you.
No one knows what the future days has in store for us.
Maybe TXBL users will revert to using LBL once it's polished!
Well I said yet, they could add support to it.
only you defend thatAh! So the claim TXBL support this is not true? Interesting!
Let's see the scores:
LBL: loads decrypted card/eshop/dlc/mods & size friendly (+5)(in a very crappy way with errors)
TXBL: loads xci card games (+1)( correctly with no errors)(doesnt run unpaid dlc but runs dlc that were paid)
only you defend that
only you defend that
Do we really need fighting? But, I think a fix for LBL has already been discovered. It's likely that game incompatibility is caused by title ID offset... I'm currently testing this as we speak.I hope you'll not eat those once LBL becomes superior to TXBL
One is free, the other isn't, which would you rather choose?Hi Guys!
Here's food for thought:
Which one of the two backup loaders is superior?
What are the benefits / drawbacks of each?
Which one will you be using?
I myself prefer the LayeredFS method as it might have one feature TX one has not!
I don't want to pay for a hack. I'd rather pay for the games instead!One is free, the other isn't, which would you rather choose?
Did Team Xecuter raped and murdered your family? You seem to be really bias against them for some reason.
This is a discussion whereupon we share our point of view. Keeping the humor and having an open mind about things is what makes this worthwhile.
To answer your question: No. TX did such no thing! And these questions are out of place!
But I don't think asking for people's opinion about something (TX could brick their device if they don't own a legit licence) makes me biased in any way.
And if you look at the title it is a comparison of the features offered by LBL and TX OS. I know how LBL works but since I don't have any TX device I can only rely on what people tell hence the reason why I'm asking.
By disregard everyone opinion on both and only support LayerFS? If you can't even accept SX OS is obvious superior from the poll you make yourself, what is the point of continue spamming this thread?
1. Tx is already working on card2 and should be out in next update.
2. You got evidence SX OS have brick code? SX OS can't be cracked due to the security TX put in, even the cracker gave up and is now trying to spoof the console id. Haven't heard of any brick from peoples who try to crack it.
3. Both LayerFS and SX OS got banned if you have read the ban thread (which I assumed you didn't and only read the title)
OK. I appreciate your point of view which by the way is also biased.
- Where did I say only TX OS is causing ban? I merely said Nintendo was banning people so don't assume.
- If I had evidence why would I ask people around? Do you have evidence also that it is safe?
OK. I appreciate your point of view which by the way is also biased.
- Where did I say only TX OS is causing ban? I merely said Nintendo was banning people so don't assume.
- If I had evidence why would I ask people around? Do you have evidence also that it is safe?
(TX could brick their device if they don't own a legit licence) makes me biased in any way.
You should edit or not use that picture then, since it seems like it implies only SX will get you ban.
Do you have an identity disorder?
Yup, that’s much better. I’m also sorry for what I said earlier, it’s not something that should be said or asked to anyone.