That's the one I used as well, I think it's a little bit more realistic for real-world scenariosHere's what I got with the website mashers used
Your score: 297 CPM (that is 59 WPM)
Why?Sorry to burst bubbles, but there's no way that many of you are getting 100+ WPM.
It is at the extreme end of the curve. It's like a poll asking what people made and a chunk of the people replied saying they bring home over $500,000 a year.Why?
same here, plus i constantly look up to check myself lolit took me 3 minutes to type this . . . lol
. . .
really though i type slow but not that slow . . . its because i cant spell worth shit . . . so no matter how fast i go i still need at least 3 minutes to post something like this . . . even with the horrid punctuation and grammar . . . so i selected the lamest option available
yep i got that aswellLast time I checked, I was like 90 WPS. The only thing really hindering me isn't typing so much, it's that I am actually dyslexic, so trying to read and properly spell a word at the same time really hinders me.
SAMEsame here, plus i constantly look up to check myself lol
If we were talking about a random sample from the population then I would agree, we would expect a much lower average. But we are a biased sample here of people who are very experienced in computers and technology. So you can't really talk about a normal distribution in this situation.It is at the extreme end of the curve. It's like a poll asking what people made and a chunk of the people replied saying they bring home over $500,000 a year.