Ever considered the opposite? If all the witnesses, evidence and convictions DO point out to a narrative where Trump has done illegal acts, then the white house is compromised as well as a large part of the republican party. How do you think that'll hold up in terms of faith in their political parties?Not even weird at all. This will be devastating to the Democratic Party if no collusion is found. People won’t have faith in mainstream media. They will see him a victim of false allegations on the Trump Russia deal without any proof to begin with. It’s not about him become of president on accident. Will they apologize if no evidence come out but they were pretending there was this mountain of evidence. Many people lives have been ruined from this investigation. And lots of money has been spent to fight this legally. This damaged a lot of things. And Trump will have to pardon a lot of people.
And so far evidence shows that Trump has been going against the wishes of Russia and Putin, showing he is not an agent of Putin. There are no more indictments from Muller, and none that connect Trump to Russia. If he had the evidence he would of done indictments by now. You have Noam Chomsky the world most renowned intellect saying that their is no evidence to suggest that Trump is a agent of Putin, so far evidence suggests the opposite. And this guy is basically the God Father of the left. Most evidence right now points in the opposite direction.
And Right now people are devastated that no indictments are made against Trump. And Trump team is celebrating that there is no indictments against them. This is what we know so far without knowing what’s in the Muller Report.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fo...ort-filed-with-no-new-indictments-planned.amp
If false allegations are a crime, who is really the culprit? The whole investigation could've happened well under the radar and away from the press, but where Mueller made barely any public statement, Trump twittered about it on a daily basis.
Oh, and...the allegations are stated on solid grounds. It would be a different thing if there was no evidence, but there are already quite some convictions. It's about a year too late to still call it a witch hunt.
And...I don't think you understand how evidence works. As investigators, it's THEIR task to search and come up with evidence of what they are investigating (which, again, is aimed at the people AROUND Trump. I know fox news makes it seem as if Mueller was doing bad at doing something else, but he has some very good results in his task at hand). Saying "there is evidence that he is innocent" is ridiculous. You can hardly prove something that didn't happen.
Trump being victorious is to be expected. That's just how he is: downplaying losses to give the impression of winning to his fan base. The North Korean summits were so successful that Kim Jong-Un left suddenly. The Mexican wall was so successful that the government shutdown was ended AND a shutdown was stuck in limbo. And those are just the most glaring examples. So please...don't pretend that the white house is somehow an objective source in this matter.