I've become increasingly disappointed and disgusted by the negative influence that social justice warriors have had on society. ...
From comic books, and movies to video games, they've left their toxic stench on everything.
This just in: most comic books, movies, and video games are pulp trash designed to appeal to the audience of today, even if that appeal is the [mock] outrage. Look no further than Blaxplotation flicks, 50s Sci-Fi, most Westerns, etc. Today it's yet another rehash of a rehash of a rehash of a comic book. Let Superman die (for good this time) already.
This isn't about SJWs or any of that shit, you are just upset that they changed a character in a manor that now effects how you relate to that character.
Nerd! Seriously, though, it's like hearing people argue over whether the manga, drama CD, or anime are the best adaption instead of anyone realizing the problem is you're consuming the same thing three times and arguing about it.
Ah yes, SJWs, leave it to the pandering and sycophantic behaviors of them to coerce certain media to adapt to their agenda, or get called out.
If it bleeds, it leads. Me? I don't watch Comic Book movies. I watched/read enough and have had my fill. Now, point me to something that's not DC/Marvel where the objective isn't to just reuse character X/Y/Z in yet another permutation for which I could actually feel some sort of outrage that they're mutilating or spindling the character in some fashion that I have any concern left about, and we can talk.
That's another thing that irks me, why do fictional characters have to have a certain orientation, or appearance, or anything tied to real attributes? The characters aren't even real people. Same goes with
characters in a video game, or novel. They're not even real, so why is it an issue?
People get upset about "naked" polygon boobs or "blood" polygons. Without anthropomorphizing--*cough*your avatar*cough*--people have a difficult time relating. Real people have a certain orientation (usually), appearance, etc. I think at some level people who spend more than just a passing time thinking about characters instinctively go "Fuck, Marry, or Kill"? There are exceptions--I don't think I've thought about those things with Mario, although I have killed him plenty of times--, but then I don't have any emotional or lasting attachment with Mario.
I guess that reduces the point to: if you want to have a character where you have no real emotional attachment to, you can do basically anything you want with them so long as you keep them recognizable by their attributes. So, if Nintendo had changed Mario's appearance substantially on his second/third outing, we'd all tolerate Mario as some tall blond in one game and some short Arabian in another. Instead, we're left to only accept him as a plumber, doctor, melee fighter, painter, etc.
PS - Seriously, the one thing I would definitely agree with is that without a consistent appearance, we wouldn't know who the character is. In the case of comic books, that's 90% the uniform.