So, the more people tend to discover within 5.0, the more it seems like a revision (whether it's to fix the hardware vulnerabilities, or to cash in on a new, but upgraded revision of the Switch) is inevitable. Of course, people would understandably be upset if a more powerful console released considering it's only been about 12 months (which isn't too long in the grand scheme of things. The DS Lite came out 16 months after the original DS released), so they have to be careful.
But what if they're doing this as a buyback system? They release a new system, something more powerful, akin to how the XboneX was released, then in order to appease early adopters, they allow you to cash in your system for 200, 300 bucks towards the new system. Early adopters get the new console cheap, Ninty gets vulnerable systems off the market, developers get the sense of security that's necessary for the development of a platform and games run better because dynamic resolution. Games could also be patched to take advantage of the new system resources, must like how PS4 games are done for the PS4 pro.
Thoughts?
But what if they're doing this as a buyback system? They release a new system, something more powerful, akin to how the XboneX was released, then in order to appease early adopters, they allow you to cash in your system for 200, 300 bucks towards the new system. Early adopters get the new console cheap, Ninty gets vulnerable systems off the market, developers get the sense of security that's necessary for the development of a platform and games run better because dynamic resolution. Games could also be patched to take advantage of the new system resources, must like how PS4 games are done for the PS4 pro.
Thoughts?