No, homebrew still works.i mean in homebrew and hacking scene wise??
well i am on 3.0.1 and i see this is a shitty firmware to stay on (not 3.0.0 with the cool stuff) not with the running capability for games of 4.1No, homebrew still works.
you mean the dongle update the firmware??If you are getting the pro with the dongle, there is no need to stay on 3.01
Oops wrong quote, thought you were the OPyou mean the dongle update the firmware??
i got the SX OS only and works fine except with the games requires higher firmware and i don't think TX will resolve this cause it mean emuland and they have no plans for it at the moment per their FAQ
i mean in homebrew and hacking scene wise??
I just wanted it to work well so when I got my SXOS I just went ahead and updated so I could use exfat without issue.
what happens if switch burns ALL efuses?Dont bother with the nand exfat implementation. As soon as you use SX OS you won´t be able to downgrade back to 3.0.2
People are just starting to find out that the SX OS also burns efuses.
https://gbatemp.net/threads/how-to-...ally-without-burning-any-fuses.507461/page-17
This should be more known.
what happens if switch burns ALL efuses?
Just wanted to correct you that there are no other coldboots to be waiting for if you're not on the latest firmware. All of the unreleased exploits that work up to 4.1 are warmboots, i.e. loading a webpage.Executers SX OS works on 5.1.0, but if you're holding out for atmosphere and things such as coldboot etc, then staying on or lower than 4 is recommended.
Just wanted to correct you that there are no other coldboots to be waiting for if you're not on the latest firmware. All of the unreleased exploits that work up to 4.1 are warmboots, i.e. loading a webpage.
Pretty sure this is the 4.1 exploit she is referring to since it reaches Trustzone-level exploitation which is all that's needed to load any type of unsigned codeMaybe it was the way I worded it which is why I said holding out... I think Kate Tempkin has been a little vague on what is and isn't possible with her exploits, but from the sounds of things they're likely to be hardmods anyway. As for 4.1 - She's always said the lowest firmwares have the most vulnerabilities and she said that they had non-coldboot hacks up to 4.1 as well. Then over the last few days I've seen people mention 4.1 as the cut off for coldboot.
Anyway, it's all a bit irrelevant now because I think I'm just going to update. If I grow tired of using the jig, I can just use TX's auto rcm and then all I need to insert is the dongle each time which is hardly a ball ache. The only time I would need to bother with the jig is when a new revision of SX OX is released and given Nintendo's slow release window, it's not going to be that often anyway.
Got some good news (sorry that it takes over a minute for the lennies): https://t.co/hGdPOchTVo
— Michael (@SciresM) February 16, 2018
Anyway, I would strongly recommend not updating when new firmwares release.
Pretty sure this is the 4.1 exploit she is referring to since it reaches Trustzone-level exploitation which is all that's needed to load any type of unsigned code
https://twitter.com/SciresM/status/964619151913336833
Also to add on, if they were hardmods, then they would be inferior to the current tethered exploit as it reaches the highest level of code execution (coldboot). Since the hardmod in this case is as simple as using a 3D-printed jig, any hardmod that is as simple or even simpler will not make the differences between the hardmods significant enough of a trade-off that you would use one for bootrom access over ones that achieve it later down the console's power cycle.
I believe the other hardmods she was referring to were dongles that would automate the process of sending a payload rather than connecting the Switch to a second device via USB.Maybe you're right... although she herself did say that some of her exploits were hardmods as it was in her Fusee Gelee faq. But maybe she's since given up on the hardmods in favour of this. Oh well, so to summarise, SX's is a jig and dongle or just dongle if you use RCM, and Temkins is loading e-shop and waiting for the redirect to inject the payload. Both seem as fairly straight forward as each other, although I'd say TX will be more supportive of their solution, given Temkin's virtue signalling tendencies.
I believe the other hardmods she was referring to were dongles that would automate the process of sending a payload rather than connecting the Switch to a second device via USB.
If you couldn't tell already, Kate is very anti-TX. So it makes sense why she would tout a cheaper/free version of whatever TX was dishing out. At the very least, its an option for those who have the capabilities should follow. In fact, there's a thread here on GBATemp where users got together to make their own version of the dongle.Huh?... So similar to Executer's solution then? And if this was the hardmod, she would expect people to be able to construct this dongle themselves?