Not to mention theres a ton of video tutorials of the sxos, but with Nintendo going on a rampage taken down sxos related videos on youtube It might reflect on the current search numbers
Here we go...I like how your definition of intelligence is the method of piracy. You yourself must be a world-wide intellect. It is almost adorable how people feel themselves as superior by using anything other than OSX.People who searched for SX OS are dummies who need to be hand-held through everything, and didn't know where to look.
ReiNX users know to go directly to GBATemp, or the SwitchHacks reddit, or the discord channel they've already joined, or the GitHub repo...
People who searched for SX OS are dummies who need to be hand-held through everything, and didn't know where to look.
ReiNX users know to go directly to GBATemp, or the SwitchHacks reddit, or the discord channel they've already joined, or the GitHub repo...
I confirm that the link reflects what I have posted previously. The intention was merely to share Google trends results hopefully no one is gonna start a flight.
Yeah no. Just because SX OS users bought a licence doesn't automatically mean they have a job or a life. Heck I'd even argue that Reinx users do actually have a life since they're just not using the OS for piracy. I'd also argue that Reinx is contributing to the homebrew community with custom themes and the toolkit.People that use SX OS are people that value their time, because they have jobs, families, friends and social engagements.
People that use ReiNX are quite the opposite.
I think this formula is pretty accurate to describe the actual status of the CFW usage on the Switch.
The fact that you cannot install an update or DLC without using an .NSP file already makes .NSP files superior.I still have problems deciding, half my games are XCi and half NSP, I'm running Rei right now
ReiNX NSPs:
-Slightly Smaller and faster (Around 200-400MBs)
-Cooler to have them all in main menu
-It's safer if you stay offline and update via NSPs
-You can convert from XCI > NSP
-Most Indy games are in NSP
-Have to download updates on your own
-You can write to NAND (Internal Memory), this can be pro and con
-Slightly a pain to install like CIAs
OS SX XCI:
-Drag and drop install
-You can use multiple SD cards
-Harder to detect because it simulates the cartridge but going online there's always a risk
-Cool management tool
-Can't go from NSP > XCI
-Have to pay for the License
-You have to load games 1 by 1
-Slightly bigger and slower
This is what I know so far but I still can't decide...I'm slightly biased to NSP
And also if you use certain programs you can install game updates and DLC without needing a firmware update.The fact that you cannot install an update or DLC without using an .NSP file already makes .NSP files superior.
The fact that you cannot install an update or DLC without using an .NSP file already makes .NSP files superior.
Allow me to rephrase then: You can get DLC for free with .NSP files unlike .XCI files which either have to rely on .NSP files or purchasing them. .NSP are superior objectivelyYea but you can also directly update from Nintendo even if you're banned witch makes it easier because you don't have to go looking for the updates. So like every con also has pros and vice versa >.>
Allow me to rephrase then: You can get DLC for free with .NSP files unlike .XCI files which either have to rely on .NSP files or purchasing them. .NSP are superior objectively
People that use SX OS are people that value their time, because they have jobs, families, friends and social engagements.
People that use ReiNX are quite the opposite.
I think this formula is pretty accurate to describe the actual status of the CFW usage on the Switch.
Allow me to rephrase then: You can get DLC for free with .NSP files unlike .XCI files which either have to rely on .NSP files or purchasing them. .NSP are superior objectively
You're late to the party.LMAO, seems that took to you a lot of time drop a folder into your SD -.-"
Method 2 also is: smaller, more convenient to access, isn't locked down to a shitty CFW and also is necessary to load updates and DLC.Method 1:
(1) Copy XCI to SD card
(2) Launch game
Method 2:
(1) Copy NSP to SD card
(2) Install NSP
(3) Delete NSP from SD card
(4) Launch game
If you think that method 2 is a superior one, well... it's called down syndrome.
Even though you still have to install DLC or updates via NSP, it's objectively superior to use XCI for the game itself.
Method 1:
(1) Copy XCI to SD card
(2) Launch game
Can you not use multiple sd cards with Reinx? I originally had a 64gb sd card that I had in my switch and when I tried to transfer the files to my 256gb card, it wouldn't work. Reinx would show when the switch was booted up but the homebrew menu wouldn't work.I still have problems deciding, half my games are XCi and half NSP, I'm running Rei right now
ReiNX NSPs:
-Slightly Smaller and faster (Around 200-400MBs)
-Cooler to have them all in main menu
-It's safer if you stay offline and update via NSPs
-You can convert from XCI > NSP
-Most Indy games are in NSP
-Have to download updates on your own
-You can write to NAND (Internal Memory), this can be pro and con
-Slightly a pain to install like CIAs
OS SX XCI:
-Drag and drop install
-You can use multiple SD cards
-Harder to detect because it simulates the cartridge but going online there's always a risk
-Cool management tool
-Can't go from NSP > XCI
-Have to pay for the License
-You have to load games 1 by 1
-Slightly bigger and slower
This is what I know so far but I still can't decide...I'm slightly biased to NSP
That requires an extra tool and extra steps. So NSP is smaller and more convenient than XCI full stop.Trim XCI using NXTrimmer to get file size as small as NSP.
SX can install NSP and XCI as NSP.
ReiNX is for free
The choice is yours.