The U.S. government is seeking a five-year sentence for Team Xecuter's Gary Bowser

unnamed.jpg

In new court documents released yesterday, the U.S. government discussed its desires for sentencing in the case of Gary Bowser, who was the public face of Team Xecuter. The U.S. is recommending sixty months, or five years, of imprisonment for Bowser, a sentence it admits is "greater than the sentence recommended by the Probation Office," and comes on top of the $4.5 million fine he's already accepted after pleading guilty. (That's only for the criminal case brought against him by the U.S. government; in the civil suit against him filed by Nintendo of America, he was recently ordered to pay $10 million.)

The state feels, however, that this sentence is justified due to the due to Bowser's importance in Team Xecuter, his "history and characteristics," and as a proper deterrent against cybercriminal activities. The state points out that Team Xecuter was a highly sophisticated, multinational business that cost the videogame industry between an estimated $65 million and $150 million in damages, and it could not have operated as effectively without Bowser's marketing. They also claim that he has a history of criminality - citing a charge of forgery and fraud under $5000 from 2004 - and that he has a risk of recidivism, given how long he has worked in the criminal space. "After he is released, the same financial hardships and social isolation that led to his becoming the public voice of the Team Xecuter enterprise will be present when he reenters society after serving his sentence," says one section of the document. Finally, they believe that it is a "just punishment" that will help deter other potential cybercriminals, given how difficult it can be to identify or extradite offenders, citing Bowser's own co-defendants in this case, Max Louarn and Yuanning Chen.

Conversely, the defense is requesting a nineteen month sentence, as they believe the prosecution is exaggerating the importance of his role in Team Xecuter, that his character is defensible and that, as a Canadian citizen, he has been and will be treated worse in the American prison system than an American citizen would.

"Mr. Bowser was used by Max Louarn," states the defense plainly near the beginning of the document. They go on to downplay his role in the organization, citing documents provided in discovery and Bowser's plea deal. Team Xecuter “generated at least tens of millions of dollars of proceeds," according to Bowser; however, he believes millions of it "must" have gone to Louarn and Chen, with "the rest" of it going to unindicted developers, manufacturers and resellers of Team Xecuter products, as Bowser was only paid between $500 and $1000 per month by Louarn. He is estimated to have made $320,000 over the course of his seven years with Team Xecuter, including his pay and ad revenue generated from independent resellers, despite assuming the highest risk by marketing these products. In addition to the pay discrepancy, the defense also asserts that while Bowser's role was important, he was not the leader, and that "without Chen or Louarn, there would be no enterprise. But without Mr. Bowser, Louarn would have found someone else to be 'the face' of this effort." The defense also maintains that the sentence is disproportionately harsh compared to similar offenses, citing United States v. Nomm, a case from 2015 regarding the sale of pirated media. Similar to Bowser's case, it regarded one person being indicted for the actions of a piracy group, wherein the defendant pleaded guilty, had been involved with the group roughly as long as Bowser was involved with Team Xecuter, was estimated to have caused $400 million in damages, and generated $150 million in profit, yet was only sentenced to 366 days in prison.

The defense goes on to discusses Bowser's tumultuous and isolating childhood, which they believe led to his love of computers and eventually his criminality. There are also quotes from several friends of Bowser's who defended his character, describing him as a man who “wanted to please people and be liked,” and said they would help him when he is released back to Canada, to help prevent him returning to criminal activity.

Lastly, the defense asserts that concessions should be made for the conditions in which Bowser has been contained, and the difficulties of being a Canadian citizen in the American prison system. Bowser has been detained since October 2, 2020, as "Bowser is a Canadian citizen with no status in the U.S. and no family resources in Canada, it was impossible to achieve his presumptive pretrial release." By the time of sentencing, Bowser will have been detained for sixteen months. The defense argues that, if their nineteen month sentence is granted, he will essentially be serving a thirty-nine month sentence, with the first sixteen already served. Bowser has also spent this time dealing with medical issues, such as an infection of COVID-19 and elephantiasis, contracted in 2018, that necessitates the use of a wheelchair or cane and has been described as a "permanent deform[ity]" by medical records. Despite this, he did not "sit around feeling sorry for himself," and has spent his time in custody reading self-help books and has lost a hundred pounds. They also believe that he is being treated unfairly as a Canadian citizen, as any American would have been released on appearance bond, rather than spending all this time in prison, and likely would have been redirected to a minimum-security camp. His status as a deportable also prevents his inclusion to several early-release programs, such as the Earned Early Release program that the defense believes he would have qualified for due to his self-improvement, or the RDAP substance abuse program, which would he would have qualified for "based on his long-time abuse of alcohol."

A judge will soon make a decision regarding Bowser's sentencing.

:arrow: Source (Application for Commissioner Order)
:arrow: Source (Defendant's Motion)
 

badman112

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
206
Trophies
1
XP
860
Country
Actually yes. Conrad Murray was jailed for manslaughter and only got 4 years, then only served 3 of those years. Manslaughter isn't considered quite the same as "murder" but the point is that you could cause the death of someone and face a far lesser sentence for doing so.
Its their in there article they want to deter others and justify this way of sentencing. Criminal law will always be broken and the people in power always will get the last say. This is one of the reasons why the world is so shit. If i was superman i would have enslaved these types of people to do non-stop community work till their dead without any remorse untill they out live theor usefullness.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sley

sley

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2017
Messages
226
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
869
Country
Germany
Solid defense for him, I don't think that he will actually receive 5 years.
I do think that he WILL be spending time in prison though. Trying to lengthen the sentence just for the sake of setting an example is inhuman.
 
Last edited by sley,

brickmii82

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
1,442
Trophies
1
Age
41
XP
2,930
Country
United States
Reading the motion, that's brutal.

Maybe use something like the Conrad Murray sentencing, and use the prosecution's insistence that this is a high profile case that needs to set a precedent to segue into a correlation of application. Argue that justice shouldn't be relative to your wallet size. Justice is pragmatic before being symbolic.
 

eyeliner

Has an itch needing to be scratched.
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
2,891
Trophies
2
Age
44
XP
5,538
Country
Portugal
I remember a few months ago people where in dire want of seeing Gary Bowser doing jail.

He will now, and all I see is a beautiful communion of wills of seeing Gary Bowser NOT doing time.

Bunch of hypocrites.
 
Last edited by eyeliner,
  • Like
Reactions: Aerocool

chrisrlink

Has a PhD in dueling
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,561
Trophies
2
Location
duel acadamia
XP
5,742
Country
United States
Yeah it is, a save manager is just used for backing up, doesn't have to be used for piracy or some shit. I really don't think Nintendo would win the court case because they really have nothing to back them up with. Using some random forum user's thread, calling things illegal without citing a law against it.
sounds like what take 2 did and look what happened they lost and i'm shocked that the lawyers didn't get slammed with a purjury charge lying in court saying the RE3/VC/SA project came bundled with the game itself which it didn't any normal citizen would be facing jail time for lying in court but working for the legal team of one of the shittiest companies in america gives you a free pass i guess
 

Ampersound

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Messages
276
Trophies
0
Age
37
XP
1,471
Country
Germany
I love how the defense's statements could be summed up as "He was bad, but look, there are other bad people out there!", as if that could hold up any water. The man's fucked, specially since this trial will likely serve as both a precedent and a deterrent for future piracy related cases.

Remember peps, regardless of your opinions piracy is a crime. You won't get in any real problems if you just consume stuff you pirate, but selling piracy is playing with fire, and you WILL get burnt. Going to jail, paying fines and getting a criminal record just for getting paid $320,000 over the course of 7 years is not worth it at all.
The amount of "bad" does matter a lot.
Of course you won't be hanging someone who stole food as a desperate measure.

There are far worse things than being an annoyance to a big tech company.
But people start to care a lot when money is involved.
 

CrisMod

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Messages
422
Trophies
0
Age
38
XP
1,358
Country
Italy
The rule of:

Punish one for taming others......

I don't know his private life or what so ever, but, if it's really a BIG crime person guilty for other bad crime things it's one story, but if not, for such brain, as example a company like SONY pay them hackers because they can discover some system security fault, here Nintendo if one person that it's not completely (maybe) inside the world of legal but sell a piece of hardware that must be stopped for the businnes that he created; they attack his private life and it ruins completely his entire existence.

Seems a bit excess
 

Deleted member 532471

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Messages
233
Trophies
0
Age
36
XP
532
Country
United States
Ridiculous


These numbers are garbage as most pirates had no intention of buying said game from the beginning ( and in today's culture, pirates still buy a game afterwards if they like it)
Not to mention it boosted console sales just like with the Ds, Wii and ps2 so they broke even
 

CrisMod

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Messages
422
Trophies
0
Age
38
XP
1,358
Country
Italy
Ridiculous


Piracy is what helped the DS, Wii and ps2 to become best sellers
You forgot the most icon console PS1............ PS1 / Playstation/ SONY became famous on the war of console 90's , THANKS to the console hardware modification.

Playstation, in our days wasn't so famous if not thanks for the piracy as well; and in our days it's even different, because the console actually you still buy the Original games, but you use the mods for homebrew apps and copy preservation of your own games collection. The MOD in general it's complemetary for the success of one console brand to sell more volume of your machine, and undirectly to earn more money on the game industry....
 

DarknessPlay3r

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Messages
172
Trophies
0
Age
38
XP
2,104
Country
Canada
Ridiculous


These numbers are garbage as most pirates had no intention of buying said game from the beginning ( and in today's culture, pirates still buy a game afterwards if they like it)
Not to mention it boosted console sales just like with the Ds, Wii and ps2 so they broke even
Still, those said pirates who bought TX all spent money on piracy instead of paying money towards the software they pirated.

The general logic being "those pirates" *would* have bought software if they couldn't pirate.

Thanks to generalization those of us who utilize things like Atmosphere and the like for homebrew and the like get lumped in with the user base that purchases TX products with the sole intention of stealing software and evading paying for it.

I feel like there is a good venndiagram that could show the size of the overall user base, and what portion of people who buy legit, those who buy but still use things like Atmosphere, and straight pirates. The later two being a very small subset of the overall user base.

Still looks better on paper and tax related paperwork to be able to claim "losses" for a larger portion. The business side of things benefits from larger numbers from things like this from all the bullshit that goes on with large corporations and the like.

Estimated damages like this can be likened to things like forecast earnings and sales. They claim oh our sales model stated that we should have hit this target mark for sales and earning but it didn't because of... and piracy becomes apart of the statistics for why...
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Metoroid0 @ Metoroid0: im more interested in metroid prime 4