well I am Aactually A Computer Engineer, I am asking do to time contraints. I aint got the time to research this kind of stuff, Its just easier to ask sometimes I guess.
Thanks for being kind guys thanks alot.
Time restraints isn't a reason. You dont' really need to research on it anyways, logic would tell u that there IS ABSOLUTELY no difference. And you actually admit that u're a computer engineerÂ.
well I am Aactually A Computer Engineer, I am asking do to time contraints. I aint got the time to research this kind of stuff, Its just easier to ask sometimes I guess.
Thanks for being kind guys thanks alot.
Time restraints isn't a reason. You dont' really need to research on it anyways, logic would tell u that there IS ABSOLUTELY no difference. And you actually admit that u're a computer engineer.
A noob with ENGINEER as nickname asks for such nice answers...
It's like going on an artistic forum, with PAINTER has nickname and ask is oil painting are based on colored oils...
Time restraints isn't a reason. You dont' really need to research on it anyways, logic would tell u that there IS ABSOLUTELY no difference. And you actually admit that u're a computer engineer.
wha?
by logic, I would have assumed that it might be slower due to the roms being 'emulated' and that maybe responding to touchscreen interrupts would be slower,of course i know that the emulation is pretty much the same from reading through the forums.
I think that you're treating ENGINEER abit unfairly even though his topic might be abit redundant...
Let's not all be know-it-alls...we all have to start somewhere
I don't think there is any "emulation" going on buddy, only patching for saving... The games are running on the real hardware, not a DS emulator on the DS itselfÂThe only difference MIGHT be cart speed.
Question yourself for real: Do my PS2 or Xbox backups run the same on their respective hardware? The answer is... quite obvious isn't it?
So logically, I would assume that code (or games if you prefer) thats running on the hardware it's meant to run on would... well... run exactly the sameÂ