Source? I'm pretty sure 1.0.0 has a tiny bit more (but still unlikely) chance of getting coldboot.Misinformation again. 1.0.0 will get a coldboot on launch when everything above up to 4.1.0 might get a coldboot in the future
Source? I'm pretty sure 1.0.0 has a tiny bit more (but still unlikely) chance of getting coldboot.Misinformation again. 1.0.0 will get a coldboot on launch when everything above up to 4.1.0 might get a coldboot in the future
Source? (I can be wrong)Misinformation again. 1.0.0 will get a coldboot on launch when everything above up to 4.1.0 might get a coldboot in the future
SciresM has said it enough countless times through all these useless threads that get started over and over again. I am not gonna search for all of that but it has been said a Thousand times already and still people claim differently.Source? I'm pretty sure 1.0.0 has a tiny bit more (but still unlikely) chance of getting coldboot.
Straight from SciresM:SciresM has said it enough countless times through all these useless threads that get started over and over again. I am not gonna search for all of that but it has been said a Thousand times already and still people claim differently.
Source? (I can be wrong)
When did he say that ? Because date mattersStraight from SciresM:
I think in the long term, maybe 1.0.0 could get a solution where you turn it on and it boots into softwarehax.
Then i'll find you a different one where he did say it differently and told people to stay at 1.0.0May 19th
He definitely said it since lower is always better, but still coldboot is not anywhere near confirmed, much less on launch, even on 1.0.0.Then i'll find you a different one where he did say it differently and told people to stay at 1.0.0
I wouldn't mind the source... about 1.0.0 coldboot on launch.Then i'll find you a different one where he did say it differently and told people to stay at 1.0.0
Up to 3.0.2 is coldboot possible.To OP, from what I've gathered....... (and somebody can correct me if I'm wrong), AS OF RIGHT NOW, the -ONLY- people that will get a coldboot Haxchi type exploit on their Switch are people still on the original 1.0.0 firmware. (You turn on your Switch and it boots into a CFW or whatever.... like the Wii U CBHC.) But who knows when this will actually happen.
To folks that are beyond 1.0.0, once Atmosphere is released, you'll get a hack where you can power on your Switch (and without the need for a dongle, Fusee Gelee, or anything weird), you can open your browser and go to a self-hosted address (or SOME OTHER entry point) and do XYZ and then boot into CFW (aka, Atmosphere) and run Homebrew or whatever.
Again, if any of the above info is wrong, please correct me.
Personal opinion: since I only give a crap about piracy, and could care less about Nintendo's crappy on-line service, I'm probably gonna toss the SX in my 4.1 Switch, update the FW to 5.x and play away. Since this Switch is past 1.0.0, I'm going to guess that the Atmosphere solution will require accessing some web site or doing SOMETHING every time I do a cold boot any way, and for me, it would be just as easy to boot into the CFW, remove the SX dongle and just put my Switch to sleep when I'm done playing vs. powering it off so I don't need the dongle every time I go to play some warez. And besides, if I'm out and about, and the entry point with Atmosphere is having to access some self-hosted site, I can't do that when I'm out of the house so the dongle is more user friendly to me.
I read the news about the battery drain problem when using AutoRCM so I won't be doing that with the SX. I'll just use it to boot into CFW, remove the dongle and play that way. When I'm done, I'll just put the Switch to sleep and leave it in its' dock to charge.
I thought up to 3.0.1 but i could be wrongI wouldn't mind the source... about 1.0.0 coldboot on launch.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Up to 3.0.2 is coldboot possible.
It is up to 3.0.2, however there is no way of currently achieving it, there is a bounty up for anyone who makes one, and Scires is unaware of anyone else who is capable of doing it.Scires said:
I intend to be fully transparent about this shit, especially going forwards. At present, I'm not aware of any non-RCM means of getting code execution from coldboot. To the best of my knowledge, nobody else is, either.
I wouldn't mind the source... about 1.0.0 coldboot on launch.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Up to 3.0.2 is coldboot possible.
The user interaction involving the software hax is most likely referring to Deja Vu:As Draxzelex pointed out, sure, it's technically possible on 3.0.2 but is "extremely difficult". Who knows what THAT will involve.
Only questions I'm still not 100% sure on are:
Q1) SciresM says user interaction will be required for a software hax on firmware's up to 4.1. Is that outdated info? (ie, is Atmosphere confirmed to be working on 5.x firmwares?)
Sub-question) Any early ideas on what will be involved to get this software hax working on say a 4.1 Switch? A 5.x Switch?
The user interaction involving the software hax is most likely referring to Deja Vu:
If there were solid details, I'd imagine someone would have figured out how to do it themselves which would then lead to the exploit itself being leaked. The green screen appears similar to trying to turn off the Switch after you sent certain payloads without booting into Horizon. Forgot what exactly causes this to occur, but its normal and harmless. Most likely, it will involve some type of network connection to boot but cannot say for certain for the time being.Is there ANY solid details out on how Deja Vu is triggered? I've seen the SciresM video before. I guess the green screen at the end means ______________________________ ? This goes back to what I said earlier.... I think it's going to require your Switch phoning home to some website over the internet (doubtful) or a self-hosted site on your network (IMHO, this is how it's going to work) to launch a software hax type program and then you'll be able to boot into Atmosphere. Either way, I'd prefer the SX over a solution like that. But to each their own.