First of all, I need to clarify a point: I have already given up getting respect from drwhojan. If you look back the history of this thread, I, along with other devs, have been trying to pay respect to him (and everyone), but what I got is either equivocate reply, ignoring, and disrespect on the open source spirit. I do understand and highly agree with you on the truth of "Give respect if you want respect in return" - and also in turn, if I don't want ones respect, I don't have to pay respect to them any more.
Second, even though I don't expect respect, I think my "anti-insult" subconscious functionality was still working when I made that post, because what I described, although probably too straight forward (because I figured euphemism didn't work for him), was merely describing and asking for facts. Let me analyze my own words for you:
"You haven't answered my question"
You probably didn't know this so I don't blame you. I have asked the same question below on github (probably twice) but he hadn't answered it; instead he kept turning aside from topic to something else
"did you actually managed to pass the famous XY intro freeze, or you just assumed that you can"
This was asking to clarify his previous (again) equivocate comment "this fixes the intro freeze", and I enumerated the two possibilities that I can think of when one seems like describing a "near-fact": tested or assumed.
"I won't read your non-sense"
OK I lied a little: because I indeed first read some of his other material on github, I already knew that what he wrote was non-sense. The word "non-sense" here describes a technical state, where what he said or did didn't make sense by logic, and/or by some simple hacking knowledge. I know the "hacking knowledge" is probably too much to say here (I can continue if you want to read), so let me just give one simple example of non-sense he did: he opened a PR on github to the master branch, in order to fix a bug that exists in MY fork but doesn't exist in the master branch. (See the post above https://gbatemp.net/threads/citra-unofficial-chinese-builds-discussion.431974/page-450#post-8366749)
"until you answer this question"
This is for the sake of fairness. He kept asking me to read (and accept) what he wrote, while refusing to directly answer my question (which came from me reading his stuff). It is unfair to me if I have to accept his thing without being able to question it.
As you can see, I managed to make my words insult-free (even if I intended to insult). If one still call this insult and say I was acting like an elitist, then they are the one who find themselves weak and who admit that who lower themselves in front of me. If you are not such person, stop being hypocritical to help those who treat themselves weak, and do real talk with me. I am even fine if you "act like an elitist" over me. What I am not fine with is acting weak and attacking me from moral high ground.
Still sound like an elitist, but whatever.