No the problem is, that you are a fundamentalist, that doesnt want to look at nuance.
Anyone that doesnt preach your gospel, is bad in your mind. Even if they were the conservative Secretary of State of the US at one time.
You want to establish a Disney level story ideal of whats good, and whats bad. Without looking at human nature. Without looking at crowd behavior. Without looking at strange actions that should be the result of agent provocateurs being used on peaceful protesters, to make them more violent to get legitimacy (in the form of public consent), to move against them more forcefully.
The president in the US is stated to be all in on a 'law and order strategy' and you are copying that, without looking at what is happening at all.
You are just picking up violent acts, selectively, saying that they are wrong, because they are violent - and aiding to the narrative, that force has to be used on your own citizens to stop it.
You are currently the problem.
Because you would stand for forceful moves against protesters, at the first glimps of hearing that they smashed a window. Because you are promoting videos of violence against state forces, or shop owners, to induce more violence on citizens to stop it.
You are a hypocrite - that wants the world first and foremost, to be easy. You are putting people to sleep.
Currently you are entitled to your opinion of course.
The issue here is, that in about two weeks time, the government will shift onto your line of thought publicly, and declare the use of more violence 'needed' to shut all of this down. At which point you can start your 'I've always said it' gloating. But currently you are helping them setting that up, by telling the world, that you know wrong from right, by simply looking at it - and to stay away, with any argument that doesnt support your moral knowledge.
People that prey on moral superiority, also hold bibles high, after having moved peacefull protesters out of an area by force.
None of this is simple or easy.