I don't think you understand. The ban comes from playing backups online. It has nothing to do with homebrew. Nintendos detection method revolves around a games individual identity. Nothing else at this point.
Hacking ** CAUTION ** - Nintendo Now Banning Physical Game Carts
- Thread starter TiMeBoMb4u2
- Start date
- Views 43,209
- Replies 164
- Likes 15
This scenario is not that likely and here is why. Someone is going to have to dump a cart and then not remove its cert, which everyone knows they should do, and then post it. I game simply chancgin hands or being rented is not going ti get banned. So few people are going to dump carts and sell them so this just isn’t a big issue at all.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
I truly doubt it 20+mil Switch and thousands of people running CFW and very few messing with dumping their own games.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
The scene is such a micro small % of the entire userbase. I anyone who dumps a cart, uses ithe dump without stripping the cert and sells it is a dumb a$$ douche. So the tiny amount of people doing CfW x numbet of dumb asses is pretty small number.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
You are blowing it way out of proportion. First the cart cert only effects a game if it has online play. Which as we know the vast majority of N games do not. Second is piracy is a little itty bitty part of the market these days very few people will bother dumping and reselling games.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
I think N wil be very hostile to gamesave hacking because Pokemon is so huge and can be so negatively effected by it.
Don't forget this is just the start. For all we know Nintendo could be also flagging accounts or Switches using pirated copies. The best way to fight anti anti-piracy is a mass ban to create confusion. Harder to detect what caused the bans that way.
Seems like there could be a potential lawsuit here if it starts affecting non pirates.
so to you and to them other guys here.
i plan to use the sx os thingie and may run some 'backups'
as long as i keep my switch on airplane mode it is safe from being banned ?
and if i were to want to use my original fw and boot into it, and use my original games will i then be safe online ?
As long as you're in airplane mode, you can't be banned. But I wouldn't recommend you to go online again until we know more about what's safe and what isn't. Maybe information from using the CFW will be sent to Nintendo when you boot in OFW and go online. EmuNAND might fix this issue in the future.
pretty much, got it.
will just wait things out, maybe we could get some sort of homebrew like (psninja? i dont remember the name.)
but it was some app on ps3 where it would wipe all the logs/etc. of your system.
maybe something like that would be good for switch, in case you wanted to go online, you use that app to clear all traces of the cfw and then boot into your official fw.
and be safe online.
Yeah, that would be great. We might get such a tool in the future. For now, we can only use the clear log function in hekate. But SciresM stated that this isn't enough and there's still the risk that some information won't be deleted.
fuck off he said he wanted people playing with a modified console online banned homebrew falls under that twat
...doesn't this just affect people who go online with BBB dumps, since the certs are nulled? Haven't heard from anyone who was banned with his own cert and own private dump. I doubt Nintendo would ban legit game cards (and they haven't done that on the 3DS). This will not be "bad for the used market", that's just fear mongering. I doubt that would be legal and Nintendo would get a massive backslash.
Curious. On the one hand this kind of seems like that online pass business (something technically OK but nobody ever made a good argument for doing so) but on the other it does seem to risk people not even vaguely connected to any kind of wrongdoing being caught up in the net.
Similarly there was once a model proposed for media lending wherein you had a key you had to keep private or within trusted hands, should it be found in public then it would be revoked.
I am not entirely sure what to think. Certs tied to game carts is a useful trick for them but they could play this too harshly.
http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/game...astupdate=0&showlastupdate=1&showothersales=0
We are just out of the top 10 worldwide sales before we dip below 1 million.
If they further narrow it by region as well... false positives will become a thing that could trouble legit users.
Of course there are more... shall we say black hat methods that might be interesting here.
"plug your pokemon cart in this here terminal to get a legendary"
Or if you prefer while I am not unconcerned with the fate of Nintendo and various developers it is a rather distant concern compared to myself and those people playing games. I don't know if I can make I would rather see a thousand guilty men go free than a single innocent one troubled type statement here but it ain't far off.
On the other hand if people then want to consider second hand games worthless then I will quite happily pay a pittance and end up with a sweet game collection.
Similarly there was once a model proposed for media lending wherein you had a key you had to keep private or within trusted hands, should it be found in public then it would be revoked.
I am not entirely sure what to think. Certs tied to game carts is a useful trick for them but they could play this too harshly.
VGChartz I know but
http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/game...astupdate=0&showlastupdate=1&showothersales=0
We are just out of the top 10 worldwide sales before we dip below 1 million.
If they further narrow it by region as well... false positives will become a thing that could trouble legit users.
Of course there are more... shall we say black hat methods that might be interesting here.
"plug your pokemon cart in this here terminal to get a legendary"
But second hand... basically everything is a known market and has been forever. I always found it odd that devs would cry over such things, not as much as people actually taking them at their word though.
Or if you prefer while I am not unconcerned with the fate of Nintendo and various developers it is a rather distant concern compared to myself and those people playing games. I don't know if I can make I would rather see a thousand guilty men go free than a single innocent one troubled type statement here but it ain't far off.
On the other hand if people then want to consider second hand games worthless then I will quite happily pay a pittance and end up with a sweet game collection.
Which will probably work until said test (if done on private hardware) sees the certs being snaffled in the process.
What numbers are we expecting for Switch hacking? Right now it is all up in the air but once it crystallises the barrier to entry is rather low
i think its not true "2124-4025" is not a cartridge cert ban. i got this with my org cartridge backup also, and the cert work 100% with the cartridge insert but not as backup, its more a "sxos-mount" issue. go spam sx and not make here ban panic
Same for me, cannot go online with my own made backups (dumped with cert) using TX.
My cynical side thinks they might've found a way to affect the second hand market in a small (but legal?) way. Let's face it, their accountants care way more about the massive "lost" revenue from people selling used games compared to piracy (which only the lawyers care about).
Similar threads
-
- Portal
-
- Portal
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@RedColoredStars, Reminds me of a similar game called "Neko Atsume", similar to Nintendogs but you look after cats. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
BigOnYa:
So a man goes to the doctor because his boner wont go down. As he is laying in the hospital bed, with his thing propped up in the air, a fly is flying around and landing on the tip and bothering him, so he calls in the nurse. The nurse comes in, swats at the fly but can't quite reach it, so she climbs his boner to get better aim. After a few tries of swatting and sliding back down, she says sorry I cant get it. He says keep going, a few more tries, and I can shoot the fly down.+2 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
BigOnYa:
Pepsi owns Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut, so that made since Pizza hut pizza was sold in Taco bells.
-
@
BigOnYa:
Pepsi, and it's companies, did not pull out of Russia like most did, even tho they orig said they would, so I boycott them. (Except when drunk at 2am and Taco bell is only place open.)
-
-
-
# 