GreatDon Killah said:just browsing the source on google (at work atm) and the main work is based off hungy's work so it shouldn't that hard to debug. we can always hit him if ever we need to.
By the way covers are hardcoded in the source for easier dev we can always use a loading routine on the fly later. notice how long it takes to initialize all the covers.
i just keep on saying that it's impressive and i can't wait to get home to download it and debug it.
Don Killah said:just browsing the source on google (at work atm) and the main work is based off hungy's work so it shouldn't that hard to debug. we can always hit him if ever we need to.
By the way covers are hardcoded in the source for easier dev we can always use a loading routine on the fly later. notice how long it takes to initialize all the covers.
i just keep on saying that it's impressive and i can't wait to get home to download it and debug it.
I had the same problem when I've tested it. But I have noticed that one cover work. All covers had the size 160x225, except the one that worked. The size of this image was 160x224. So I resized every cover to 160x224 and now all covers are displayed correctly.Don Killah said:well it's all corrupted, as if we're trying to display a picture in a bad res or with the wrong size/bits.