Five Nights At Freddy's creator, Scott Cawthon, has retired from game development
- Thread starter Deleted member 546149
- Start date
- Views 36,864
- Replies 447
- Likes 4
Christians have rules they live by, but they generally don't go out of their way to gang up and harass, verbally assault, doxx others or shame them into compliance. There are some Christians that are control freaks like the liberals are, but they are not the majority and that's more of a personality trait then some religious rule.
What I find interesting about all religions is the fact they lay out exactly what is good and what is bad and it's based on analyzing behaviors and documenting their outcomes. Most modern psychology is rooted in religions, especially mindfulness and Dialectical Behavior Therapy. There's a lot of truth to be found in all religions and if you study them, which granted I haven't really scratched the surface, you can learn tools to help you in life. Christians figured out what behaviors have negative outcomes 2,000 some years ago and the world would be a better place if people would willingly learn from them.
You see, I said "willingly". I am a Christian, but I'm not going to order or try to shame and harass you into believing what I do nor am I going to show my intolerance by attacking you because you happen to have views that differ from mine. It's okay if you dislike Christians, even if you're generalizing about all of them. It's okay if you don't like me or agree with me, but if you ever do want a little extra help in life you may want to look into behaviors that produce positive outcomes as opposed to behaving in ways that produce negative outcomes.
>Wikipedia
Also lol at the "Americans are rapists too".
You know the point is that if illegal immigrants were prevented from entering a country they couldn't commit rape or murder to begin with. Unfortunately native citizens will commit crime and be punished for it. Where as any crime commited by illegals is 100% preventable by stopping them from coming in the first place.
Also how is it racist against Mexicans? What race is Mexican? There's lots of white Mexicans, Louis C.K is mexican.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Sounds more like Muslims than Christians to me.
Last edited by Purple_Shyguy,
wikipedia isn't a bad source inherently
it's open to editing, but many articles feature levels of protection that prevent most forms of vandalism
the unite the right page is one of these
in addition, malicious edits to wikipedia pages are usually restricted to changing text to garbage
actual factual misinformation is rare and usually cracked down on very quickly- sources are given on every claim, a full list is in the references
if nothing else, it is a good place to get a general idea, and if anything is confusing or seems wrong, you can check the source to confirm
for example, the claim that unite the right was a white-supremacist rally has four sources for it alone, and the introductory paragraph has 19 different sources
it's pretty much rock-solid
Last edited by Darth Meteos,
Scott is trash, can we just get this locked?
All online leftists do is whinge. "He's homophobic!!!" according to what? He donated his money out of his own free choice to the Republican Party? So that means he agrees with everything they do? BTW Donald Trump supported LGBT rights. Scott has already said he's not homophobic. Oh but that's right... internet leftists only believe in black and white, they don't believe in nuance like every normal person does. They also believe in inventing problems and then deluding themselves into believing that problem is real. Ever notice how 99% of problems internet leftists cry about, they wouldn't even care about if they weren't on Tik Tok and Twitter and many of those "issues" are blown up or straight-up false? Scott is not homophobic, he's not a "shit person". The people who harass, doxx and threaten him though? Hmm, funny now the internet lefties aren't shaming those people. You tell on yourselves every day what you're really all about: controlling everyone and bullying those who refuse to be subordinate to leftist indoctrination.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Biggest cancel culture in the world but I don't see dA eViL KrIsChAnZ trying to "cancel" Scott Cawthon over a false accusation, doxxing, harassing and threatening him and his pregnant wife. Funny how the internet lefties looove to hate Christianity but then pull out the apologetics all day when someone points out that all Abrahamic religions e.g. Islam and Judaism have the same actually violent, actually homophobic, and actually misogynistic verses in them. Hypocrisy at its finest.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Biggest cancel culture in the world but I don't see dA eViL KrIsChAnZ trying to "cancel" Scott Cawthon over a false accusation, doxxing, harassing and threatening him and his pregnant wife. Funny how the internet lefties looove to hate Christianity but then pull out the apologetics all day when someone points out that all Abrahamic religions e.g. Islam and Judaism have the same actually violent, actually homophobic, and actually misogynistic verses in them. Hypocrisy at its finest.
Last edited by atoxique,
- Wikipedia is the best compendium of information on the planet. It isn't infallible, but it has high standards for citing primary sources. If you disagree with something on Wikipedia, you can try to change it and cite your sources.
- Regardless of how you feel about Wikipedia, what I said was verifiably correct. The Unite the Right rally was a white supremacist rally.
- "A lot of white people commit violent crimes. Those crimes would be 100% preventable by removing white people from the country."
- Again, immigrants (including illegal immigrants) are less likely to commit crimes than American citizens.
You are right that Mexican is a nationality, not a race. I didn't say it was. That doesn't mean the former president's comments weren't racist, however.
Catholic Christians are the ones who are trying to prevent notable pro-choice Catholics from being able to take communion, not "Muslims." Your statement was absurd.
If a person donates money to a vehemently anti-LGBT candidate like the former president, then that means the person either agrees with the candidate's anti-LGBT policies or tolerates them. The act of giving money to the anti-LGBT candidate is homophobic regardless. There are also a lot more issues than just the former president's homophobia.
He might have sometimes said or implied he supported LGBT rights, but he demonstrably didn't. See my previous post on the topic:
Pay attention to what a person does, not what a person says. Regardless of whether or not Scott is homophobic, or thinks he's homophobic, the act of giving money to the former president was an anti-LGBT act.
However, given Scott's previous statements on his Christian beliefs, how those beliefs affect other political positions, and the money he gave to anti-LGBT candidates, it isn't a stretch to think Scott might be homophobic. If it walks like a homophobic duck and quacks like a homophobic duck, it's probably a homophobic duck.
Sometimes, an issue is simple. Supporting anti-LGBT politicians and policies is deplorable and deserving of condemnation. If a person who is pro-LGBT wants to say "I disagree with X's anti-LGBT actions and I don't want to spend money X in the future," where is the problem? It sounds like you're anti-speech and anti-freedom to me.
Anti-LGBT policies are real problems. Deluding oneself into thinking they don't cause objective harm and aren't a problem worth addressing comes from a very special place rooted in homophobia and/or privilege.
"Have you ever noticed how 99% of problems people wouldn't be concerned about if they didn't know those problems existed in order to be concerned about them?" Thank you, Captain Obvious.
I don't know what issues you're referring to, but the issue being discussed in this thread isn't one of them.
It sounds like he might be, but even if he isn't or doesn't think he is, that doesn't mean his actions weren't anti-LGBT, and that's all that matters.
I didn't say he was a shit person, even though he might be one. We are condemning his shit actions. There is a meaningful difference.
You're only going to find condemnations of harassment, doxing, threats, etc. in this thread. Nobody is condoning those things. However, the existence harassment, doxing, threats, etc., while deplorable, doesn't make Scott's actions any less deplorable.
This is about condemning actions that cause objective harm. If it's "leftist indoctrination" to not condone or stay silent about deplorable acts, sign me up.
- The "accusations" against Scott are not false.
- I can't speak for all "internet lefties," but I don't hate Christians. I think Christianity (and the other Abrahamic religions) have a lot of immorality in their holy books, I don't think the religions have met their burdens of proof, and I think the religions promote anti-skepticism. Those are things that make me think Christianity can be harmful and absurd, but I and most "internet lefties" don't "hate Christians."
- There are plenty of "internet lefties" who are Christian.
Last edited by Lacius,
Too long didn't read LOL
I would be 10000% ok with removing 100% of white ILLEGAL immigrants. Their crimes are preventable. Obviously you can't just remove native people from a country. Nor would you want to. But illegal immigration should be stopped in any nation worldwide.
Not to mention the "good people on both sides" fiasco, when he first said that he immediately said he didn't mean KKK or racist organizations and that they obviously are bad... didn't stop the media. I wouldn't care except that a lot of racist folks believed CNN and other media when they made him look racist, they took it as a sign they could cause chaos all they wanted now. https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/apr/26/context-trumps-very-fine-people-both-sides-remarks/
"
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
"Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets, and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group."
"
Last edited by kevin corms,
Is there anything the left attacked about Donald Trump for actually real or is everything just made up bullshit? Between the Impeachments and these instances in this thread it makes me wonder if anything the left has said about Trump is true.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
It's TDS. Pretty clear and cut case. I don't know much about Scott and have never played his games, but from what I've seen he doesn't look or sound like a racist person suffering from phobia's.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Oh, and LOL @ all of the lefties that want this thread closed. They can't stand to read opinions that aren't their own.
The problem with Wikipedia is that we see entire entries that are motivated purely by left wing politics so they aren't even true. An example would be the hilarious notion that there was a party swap so that now the Republicans have racist values as somehow hundreds of millions of people suddenly stopped having Republican values because a few Democrat senators decided that the Democrats were evil and that they wanted to become Republicans. That Wiki page, which I can't seem to find right now, is used by Liberals to claim that Republicans are racist because of some mythical change ... yet in reality the Republicans fought an actual war against the Democrat slave owners because they didn't want to give up their slaves.
The left uses the Wiki entry as an excuse to justify those events as they can simply claim that "oh, the Republicans switched ideologies to be exactly what we used to be and now we all have Republican values so we're the good guys". Completely and utter nonsense. The Republicans may have changed some over the years, but they didn't give up their core beliefs. We have clear evidence that the Democrats still pushed racist policies up until the early 1970's. It's odd that if the parties some how managed to switch sides that their side still governed by racist policies.
So if one page can be so misleading I'd imagine others are too. I've also randomly read things over the years about how hard it is to change misleading information that the Left has published on Wikipedia as they have their important political entries under lock and key. I don't have links because I didn't keep track of the things I read, but the gist of it was that Conservatives were angry that they couldn't edit content or the content they added or changed wasn't allowed through or it was removed shortly after they added/changed it. Here's a good search engine query that give lots of results related to what I'm talking about.
Search: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wikipedia+slanted+to+the+left
Examples being;
"May 26, 2020 - Larry Sanger, the co-founder of Wikipedia, published a blog post this month declaring that the online encyclopedia's "neutral point of view" policy is "dead" due to the rampant left-wing bias of the site."
and ...
"In 2014, Harvard faculty members Shane Greenstein and Feng Zhu published research showing that Wikipedia articles are both more politically biased than those of Encyclopaedia Britannica and more slanted to the left. The Critic argues that bias can be seen not only in Wikipedia's entries but in its very choice of sources."
You are right about a starter though. If you want a primer on non-political topics, like how to fix your bicycle or the history of Dragon Quest, Wikipedia is a good place to get a primer, but a lot of their political shit is slanted to the left (and only uses left wing sources for reference). So just like when reading Fox News I need to be careful about what I believe is true due to political bias.
Last edited by Deleted member 559230,
If your issue is with violent crimes, then illegal immigration isn't a very efficient avenue, considering they're less likely to commit violent crimes than American citizens. You can read the rest of my previous post for details when your attention span is higher.
Legal immigrants sometimes commit violent crimes too. Should we bar them from entry too? You don't seem to understand that the "some people in Group X commit crimes" argument can apply to just about any group. People out after 9:00 PM sometimes commit violent crimes, so why not institute a mandatory curfew after 9:00? There's no argument you can't make using your reasoning, and it's not compelling.
I am also not making a case for illegal immigration. I'm making a case for fixing the broken immigration system, and a case for treating all immigrants like human beings without demonizing them.
Last edited by Lacius,
You vote for the same candidate as me, you are the coolest person of all! Your vote reaffirms that I am on the right side.
You don't vote for the same candidate as me. You are the worst this world can have, you deserve that your projects disappear.
You don't vote for the same candidate as me. You are the worst this world can have, you deserve that your projects disappear.
Similar threads
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
-
-
@
Xdqwerty:
Is it safe to update a modded ps3?
Can I play online in pirated games? (with ps3hen either enabled or not) -
-
-
-
-
-
@
Xdqwerty:
@salazarcosplay, I used apollo save tool to activate my ps3 offline so i could play a game that wasnt working
-
S @ salazarcosplay:from what I understood. you load up the piratged game. you the clear the syscalls, then you play
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
