D
Deleted-355425
Guest
So if I'm on 1.0 will I still require the Japanese Puyo puyo tetris?
Yes.
So if I'm on 1.0 will I still require the Japanese Puyo puyo tetris?
yesSo if I'm on 1.0 will I still require the Japanese Puyo puyo tetris?
Off topic and I apologise but I need to ask/say this:
Does anyone else think of Abba's Voulez-Vous when they read the title of this thread?
Back on topic now, apologies for the derailment.
So if I'm on 1.0 will I still require the Japanese Puyo puyo tetris?
YesSo if I'm on 1.0 will I still require the Japanese Puyo puyo tetris?
So do I need the Japanese version or Asia version? Are they different? Was checking play asia and saw both.yes
edit: damn you mech
So do I need the Japanese version or Asia version? Are they different? Was checking play asia and saw both.
(asking Q of @SciresM) So [is] the issue with CFW on 2.x+ .., that you would need to coldboot -> sleep -> warmboot w/code execution, in order to begin the CFW[?] ... need to run the code exec on every reboot?
Okay, Thanks a lot! So, 3.0.2 is good, right?it will, but later than 1.0/2.X/3.0.0
Even if, what is the problem? You can borrow a Pokken Tournament (serial with 000) and update to 3.0.0. Voila, 'problem' solved.Just wondering, I’m seeing a lot of people on 2.x, 3.x, 4.x firmware and a very few on 1.x.
So my question is, will we have a real long term support for 1.x firmware ?
I’ve seen somewhere that 1.x is the best firmware and will be the first one to get exploit via « jamais vu ».
Are the « hackers » confident to have CFW on that version that will be maintained in the future ?
Won’t they more focus on 2.x and 3.x which are also TrustZone hackable and Homebrew ready (for 3.0.0) ?
Thanks.
Even if, what is the problem? You can borrow a Pokken Tournament (serial with 000) and update to 3.0.0. Voila, 'problem' solved.
According to "up to 4.x exploitable, but lower firmware is better" thread (sorry I can't insert the link apparently) :
1.0.0 is the only firmware permitting an emuNAND/CFW setup.
It would be a shame to give up future exploit support on this firmware in my opinion.
False.
It's been said time and time again (people even want to sticky it but apparently that's not possible for whatever reason) that up to 3.0.2 you can set up emuNAND/CFW because sciresM has access to the switch's trustzone from 1 up to 3.x.
Then, why are we still making 2 "hackable" groups ?
- 1.0.0 is the best firmware. If you're on 1.0.0, stay on 1.0.0. It will get public stuff via jamais vu on a timescale of [weeks].
For me, it means that there is something that is possible on 1.0.0 and not on higher firmwares.
- 2.0.0 - 3.0.0 are next-best, and are interchangeable. If you're on 2.0.0-2.3.0, feel free to update to 3.0.0 for homebrew (HBL launches next week!).