That's why I said "in other words." Whoops, tabzer's meltdown has gotten to the point that he can't read anymore.
So if Eric Garner had covid-19, that means he was another fatality due to that?
That's why I said "in other words." Whoops, tabzer's meltdown has gotten to the point that he can't read anymore.
If he had COVID-19 and died from it, yeah. lolSo if Eric Garner had covid-19, that means he was another fatality due to that?
If he had COVID-19 and died from it, yeah. lol
Yeah, as a cause of death. Lol, are you trying anymore?But all that's necessary is that it is on his death certificate.
Yeah, as a cause of death. Lol, are you trying anymore?
Eric Garner would have died with or without COVID-19.So, if on his death certificate, he died of asthma with covid-19 being connected as a comorbidity, or vice-versa--would you make the argument that a cop didn't kill him?
Eric Garner would have died with or without COVID-19.
It's almost like i called it when i said in an earlier post people will think the courts are currupt next. The grasping at straws and coping is real high in here.
Eric Garner, hypothetically, would have been killed BY the police officer, with or without COVID-19. I answered your question. I forgot your meltdown started to take away your literacy.That's not the question. But it seems you notice the contradiction.
Eric Garner, hypothetically, would have been killed the police officer, with or without COVID-19. I answered your question. I forgot your meltdown started to take away your literacy.
I don't think you know what irony is.Ironic
Eric Garner, hypothetically, would have been killed the police officer
I forgot your meltdown started to take away your literacy.
That's fair. We're both illiterate fuckers.--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
I don't think anyone is arguing that "unjust" COVID-19 death classifications should count. The problem with your argument is there's no evidence of widespread misclassifications. Coming up with hypothetical misclassifications doesn't demonstrate actual misclassifications.There's also the notion that if Eric Garner does have Covid-19 on his death certificate, be it just or not, that you are including him in your statistic.
I don't think anyone is arguing that "unjust" COVID-19 death classifications should count. The problem with your argument is there's no evidence of widespread misclassifications. Coming up with hypothetical misclassifications doesn't demonstrate actual misclassifications.
When you see things (election fraud, medical fraud, etc.) when there's no evidence of these things, being biased sounds like a good explanation to me.I see injustice in America being widespread, and maybe it's my bias, but I think it's an ever-growing trend which its grime that creeps into all of system that perpetuates it. The question of the breaking point occurring is not, "if" but "when?"
Whether or not something is actually evidence of a claim is objective, not subjective. So far, you've objectively provided no evidence of widespread voter fraud, etc.What I see is evidence, but it would not be reasonable to expect it to be supported by the system and the people that would suffer from it. It looks like a catch-22.