I guess since this thread is dying down, I should clear up a few things. SOPA would introduce no need for a process to get rid of sites. Unlike MU, there would be no long process behind its removal and deletion. You can look at each and every court document to see how much work was put into getting the arrests and taking down the site. Th only odd thing about this is that the CEO was not arrested (Swizz Beatz ism ironically, the CEO of MegaUpload)
Secondly, the new site is not owned or managed by the current MU team. You can check this by taking a current MU link and trying to replace "megaupload.com" with the IP address of the site floating around and using the rest of a URL from any links you might currently have. All it does is place you back on the home page of the new fake site. You can also note that the way things are written on the fake site as "evidence" that it's fake. Megaupload is a company. It is not just an every day website. Were an error like this were to happen, it would be fixed within minutes - not kept there. It's also worth mentioning that the background is not white and has no MU branding placed on it. maybe the creators of the website realized they could be tied to MU through branding it and then have themselves arrested.
As far as "Google shows fake links to torrents" - that's not Google's fault, but rather the way Google works. Google uses search results from others and how many people have clicked them to generate results for other people. Many of us torrent users also don't Google for torrent - we already have sites we use for content.
Again, SOPA doesn't need a process to take a site down. A company could claim a website of copyright infringement and the site would be gone within minutes - no process at all. SImply accuse and remove.