Thats a good millennial. Creating an additional folder on the USB stick for every game sounds like too much of a pain. I can make 100 of them in one second using mkdir on a command line - but millennial would rather not have the ability to overmount original games, and loose his original 20 games, whenever he uses the inferior solution - because it has logo. And creating a folder sounds like pain to them.
I'm not joking. This is basically how I lost all respect for the youtube tutorial crowd. They NEED simple - they cant do even a bit more complex. Which this isnt.
On a more general note. The idea to remove a users access to their included 20 games was an idiot move on part of whoever created Bleemsync.
Thats something only a hobby developer could have come up with.
I'm positive that they will try to sort that out int he future - but I'm not sticking with the worst possible solution, that was popularized by another dev striking his sails, because people flooded gpghax' issue reporting system on github with "smartphone user" type questions - and complained, that their system wouldnt boot, when they had messed up editing their game database.
I mean - all banter aside, and I'm actually a proponent of "standards" to drive development - but what you ended up in this case - was
1. The first silutoon giving up, because people demanded personal support for "how do I use PC" type stuff - them then linking to a second solution -
2. Which did NOTHING different at first, except making sure, that the database got overmounted and not replaced on system
3. Which lead to 20 people celebrating "how fast the scene was developing" (same hack, since the beginning, just different scripting)
4. Which lead to that guy - entering a deal with the libretro folks who want to bootstrap a "classics consoles hacked" innitiative badly. So bleemsync was quick to get a commercial logo - (half stolen from the dead bleemcast projec)
5. And when a better solution in every way comes along - people complaining, that something "sounds like too much hassle" - (hey if you didn't understand what I was writing, just admit - it, I could have put it even simpler..) and sticking with the "brand they know".
6. And the solution that "got traction" having the words "simple" and "safe" plastered on top of them like thats a brand USP. Tell me something new.
When all the "brand" currently is - is a different shell script.
And you can look at two shell scripts and say which ones better.
But people who cant have to go with logos I guess.
Makes me mad. (Not at you specifically... Just at the notion, that this is what drives consumer decisions - and that companies know it. Basically - consumers cant have better outcomes, because their support systems are relying on idiots reading marketing material. out loud. And if a "scene" is bootstrapped mostly on youtube - all is lost, from the get go. (How do you debate information? In youtube fudes? In the comments below?))